Jump to content

WA State Sponser-Update- Where are you now? class of 2008 - 2010

cartertucker

By cartertucker
in Visa Chat

All being well...When are you hoping to move to WA?  

330 members have voted

  1. 1. All being well...When are you hoping to move to WA?

    • September 2009 or Before
      18
    • October 2009
      13
    • November 2009
      14
    • December 2009
      13
    • January 2010
      31
    • February 2010
      18
    • March 2010
      8
    • April 2010
      22
    • May 2010
      20
    • June 2010 or Later
      173

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
pluto Platinum Member

pluto

Posted
Posted

Thanks everyone :jiggy:

 

I have printed off the form 1100 but it is only one page that says continued on the next page ........:confused:

 

Am I missing a page or is this just a usual confusing visa form :confused:

 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SHANO7 Platinum Member

SHANO7

Posted
Posted

Well done Pluto.

 

Also I have just noticed on the WA job list that refers to 3 levels of priority that Hairdeers is Top ( 2nd) but Hairdressing Manager is High (1st). How will they differntiate as the TRA code is based on Hairdresser only.

 

If we assume High Priority might get on SMP and lodged visas are placed under just Hairdresser then perhaps all lodged Hairdressers with SS might get classed as High. Just a further point sorry my OH is a self employed Hairdresser working from a salon and also mobile. the mobile work would entail buying her own stock and managing this stock, managing her own clients etc so technically, playing devils advocat here but would this class her as a Hairdressing manager ?

 

interesting point for you Jools also to refer to your agent.

 

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites
John Gilfillan Platinum Member

John Gilfillan

Posted
Posted
Well done Pluto.

 

Also I have just noticed on the WA job list that refers to 3 levels of priority that Hairdeers is Top ( 2nd) but Hairdressing Manager is High (1st). How will they differntiate as the TRA code is based on Hairdresser only.

 

If we assume High Priority might get on SMP and lodged visas are placed under just Hairdresser then perhaps all lodged Hairdressers with SS might get classed as High. Just a further point sorry my OH is a self employed Hairdresser working from a salon and also mobile. the mobile work would entail buying her own stock and managing this stock, managing her own clients etc so technically, playing devils advocat here but would this class her as a Hairdressing manager ?

 

interesting point for you Jools also to refer to your agent.

 

Shane

Hi Shane,

 

I might have missed something but I thought that TOP was the highest, HIGH was second and PRIORITY was third?

 

 

Cheers,

 

John:hug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ouseun

Guest ouseun

Posted
Posted
Yes. Definitely the priority list has taken effect. Perhaps all the TOP Priority occupations would be processed first. you may see the document as following:

The Department of Training and Workforce Development - State priority occupation list

 

Additionally,today I have heard 6 applicants have received their SS. Their occuptions are IT or engineers.

 

Good luck to everyone!

 

If the SMP has these skill then i think its good news for some

I have a TOP PRIORITY SKILL

 

good luck to all

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Suz2011

Guest Suz2011

Posted
Posted
Thanks everyone :jiggy:

 

I have printed off the form 1100 but it is only one page that says continued on the next page ........:confused:

 

Am I missing a page or is this just a usual confusing visa form :confused:

 

?

 

Hi Pluto I thought the same thing. I checked the form on DIAC website and the 2nd page is completed by WA when you send it back I think. :jiggy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
John Gilfillan Platinum Member

John Gilfillan

Posted
Posted
Hi John

 

I think I might have got them the wrong way round but the point remains the same . Hairdessing is 2nd whereas hairdressing manager is 1st. Thats clearer I think

 

 

Hi Shane,

 

No worries. I just hope that all of the priorities make the SMP mate, regardless which group they are in. Do you think they might move everyone who has SS over to the SMP just to clear the backlog?

 

John:hug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Bootco

Guest Bootco

Posted
Posted
Hi Shane,

 

No worries. I just hope that all of the priorities make the SMP mate, regardless which group they are in. Do you think they might move everyone who has SS over to the SMP just to clear the backlog?

 

John:hug:

Hi John, I think they might. I read on a thread lately from a lady who had spoken to some official at WA's migration dept' who told her that "they would do everything in their power to get everyone they had sponsored over there"! Oviously tho', DIAC would have the last word I'd imagine.

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jimm Senior Member

Jimm

Posted
Posted
Hi Shane,

 

No worries. I just hope that all of the priorities make the SMP mate, regardless which group they are in. Do you think they might move everyone who has SS over to the SMP just to clear the backlog?

 

John:hug:

I hope they do get everyone on smp who already has SS. When i applied for state sponsorship my profession was on the priority list at that time so if its not now it will really be unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Claire and Simon

Guest Claire and Simon

Posted
Posted

Hi

We unfortunately received the bad news that our State Sponsorship has been declined due to us being off list, boo!!

We did submit a 175 visa application on 19th March 2010 though (with the intention of changing to 176 with State Sponsorship) so I think for the time being we are just in for a very very very........long wait :cry:

Kelly, please could you update our timeline?

 

Thanks

Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SHANO7 Platinum Member

SHANO7

Posted
Posted
Hi Shane,

 

No worries. I just hope that all of the priorities make the SMP mate, regardless which group they are in. Do you think they might move everyone who has SS over to the SMP just to clear the backlog?

 

John:hug:

 

Personally, yes.

 

It makes sense as like we have both always said the states have selected our OH's for Sponsorship. we havent lodged independant or family we have been backd by the state we want to live in.

 

I hope we are proven right John

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pluto Platinum Member

pluto

Posted
Posted
Hi

We unfortunately received the bad news that our State Sponsorship has been declined due to us being off list, boo!!

We did submit a 175 visa application on 19th March 2010 though (with the intention of changing to 176 with State Sponsorship) so I think for the time being we are just in for a very very very........long wait :cry:

Kelly, please could you update our timeline?

 

Thanks

Claire

 

Sorry Claire to read your news :wubclub: That is a long wait to be told no :sad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ibby4

Guest ibby4

Posted
Posted

Got the good news at last, we have SS for WA!!:laugh: Also received an email from immigration allocating us a case officer, is this what normally happens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SHANO7 Platinum Member

SHANO7

Posted
Posted
Got the good news at last, we have SS for WA!!:laugh: Also received an email from immigration allocating us a case officer, is this what normally happens?

Hi ibby4

 

Thats not what normally happens.

 

What is your time line ?

Had you already lodged a visa app if so when ? What is your occupation ?

 

Thats seriuosly fast if your not on the old CSL

 

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Taz2008 PIO Chatter Box

Taz2008

Posted
Posted
Got the good news at last, we have SS for WA!!:laugh: Also received an email from immigration allocating us a case officer, is this what normally happens?

 

Hi, congrats on getting your SS.

 

Also great news that you have had contact from DIAC about a CO!

 

What category do you fall into now and when did you lodge your application??? I would think its coincidence that you have heard from both today, they must be dealing with your 175 application as they wont even know about your SS from WA until you complete the Form 1100 and send it back to WA!

 

Would love to know a little more about your timeline???

 

Well done

 

Tasha :wubclub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ibby4

Guest ibby4

Posted
Posted

Hi

I am not sure how to put on a timeline, but we applied for SS on 26/3/10 and a 175 (intending to convert to a 176) on 2/4/10. I am a physiotherapist and my OH a carpenter

The CO is asking for evidence of our SS, that is why I thought they were related, that and the emails came within 1 hour of each other

Link to comment
Share on other sites
matjones Platinum Member

matjones

Posted
Posted
Hi

I am not sure how to put on a timeline, but we applied for SS on 26/3/10 and a 175 (intending to convert to a 176) on 2/4/10. I am a physiotherapist and my OH a carpenter

The CO is asking for evidence of our SS, that is why I thought they were related, that and the emails came within 1 hour of each other

 

Ah.. you are old CSL.. that explains it. Not sure why you went for SS when you were in high priority. Did you not have enough points for 175 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...