Jump to content

Is Melbourne really Australia's biggest city?


InnerVoice

Recommended Posts

Just read this morning that Melbourne is now bigger than Sydney after Melbourne city limits were expanded to include the 'suburb' of Melton. I say suburb in the loosest sense of the word, as it is clearly a separate town with a good 10km of countryside between there and the most outer suburb of Melbourne.

Population growth doesn't seem like a statistic to be proud of in any case, but one wonders if this is just a continuation of the 'Which is better - Sydney or Melbourne?' argument, that some hold dear.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sydney and Melbourne are both huge sprawling cities.  Melbourne pips Sydney with 2,453 square km.  Sydney covers 2,037 square km.  Both will be more now as those numbers are from 2017.  Which is better?  All down to personal preference.  I like both of them     ..........................  just to visit for a few days though.  Always glad to get out of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Toots said:

Sydney and Melbourne are both huge sprawling cities.  Melbourne pips Sydney with 2,453 square km.  Sydney covers 2,037 square km.  Both will be more now as those numbers are from 2017.  Which is better?  All down to personal preference.  I like both of them     ..........................  just to visit for a few days though.  Always glad to get out of them.

I should've clarified it's about population, not urban area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marisawright said:

I agree, irrelevant, just silly media hype.

 

33 minutes ago, Blue Flu said:

Silly hype maybe. A bit akin to Perth being the longest city in the world. Oh well, is it Coffs Harbour with the biggest banana? 

Indeed, although I'm sure they'll be a few Melburnians celebrating tonight that they've beat the Sydneysiders at something! 😀

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tychen said:

More important is the underlying causes for the changes. Why has internal emigration out of Sydney been so high? That's the kind of thing the government(s) should be thinking about.

I think it's well known.  House prices.  Melbourne is expensive for housing too, but it's approximately two-thirds the cost of Sydney for an equivalent house in an equivalent suburb.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Marisawright said:

I think it's well known.  House prices.  Melbourne is expensive for housing too, but it's approximately two-thirds the cost of Sydney for an equivalent house in an equivalent suburb.

I'd assume that salaries in Sydney and Melbourne are fairly similar, so the latter is probably more affordable in that respect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it isn't hype. It is a key metric used for planning.

The size of the population of Melbourne and its projected growth is analysed to plan for important infrastructure that takes decade to create.

For example the new outer ring rail loop being built over something like 25 years. As well as major freeways like Eastlink etc, Peninsula Link.

Not to mention new hospitals and schools etc needed in the fast growing areas.

Edited by Parley
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Parley said:

Of course it isn't hype. It is a key metric used for planning.

The size of the population of Melbourne and its projected growth is analysed to plan for important infrastructure that takes decade to create.

For example the new outer ring rail loop being built over something like 25 years. As well as major freeways like Eastlink etc, Peninsula Link.

Not to mention new hospitals and schools etc needed in the fast growing areas.

Which doesn't go towards answering the question in regards to why Australian cities in general are so poorly planned?  Indeed the decline in livability stakes within world measurement, (even if in doubt of the validity of such things) will to many go a way towards underlining the declining living standards in Australian cities. 

Edited by Blue Flu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Elliott said:

To throw a spanner in the works, I believe when it comes to City council areas, Brisbane is bigger than both Sydney and Melbourne!!!! - 

One wonders how long before Brisbane and the GC will be classed as a single conurbation? It would have a combined population of about 3 million. There's certainly less open countryside between the two cities than there is between Melbourne and Melton!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InnerVoice said:

One wonders how long before Brisbane and the GC will be classed as a single conurbation? It would have a combined population of about 3 million. There's certainly less open countryside between the two cities than there is between Melbourne and Melton!

There is no open countryside at all between the Melton suburb of Caroline Springs and the rest of Melbourne. Although there is countryside in Melton between Caroline Springs and the rest of Melton. Many people were blissfully unaware that Caroline Springs wasn't in Melbourne (until the whole of Melton was).

Edited by Ken
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InnerVoice said:

One wonders how long before Brisbane and the GC will be classed as a single conurbation? It would have a combined population of about 3 million. There's certainly less open countryside between the two cities than there is between Melbourne and Melton!

We don't use that term in Australia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ken said:

There is no open countryside at all between the Melton suburb of Caroline Springs and the rest of Melbourne. Although there is countryside in Melton between Caroline Springs and the rest of Melton. Many people were blissfully unaware that Caroline Springs wasn't in Melbourne (until the whole of Melton was).

I'll take your word on that, Ken - I wasn't aware that Melton was a region as well as a town. It just looks like a separate place to Melbourne on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, welljock said:

I hadn't heard that one before but when did Mandurah become part of Perth?

Probably since the train line ended up there. But Merth never one to miss out claiming to be something or other, seems to wear that badge as fact now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, InnerVoice said:

I'll take your word on that, Ken - I wasn't aware that Melton was a region as well as a town. It just looks like a separate place to Melbourne on the map.

This map shows the city border:

City of Melton.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, InnerVoice said:

Oh, that's huge! I'm guessing that Sunbury is also considered part of Melbourne, even that's miles out too?

Yes, Sunbury is part of the City of Hume (as is Craigieburn which you can also see on that map), one of the 28 cities (including Melton) and 3 shires which form Metropolitan Melbourne.

When I moved to Australia I first lived in the City of Maribyrnong before building in the City of Wyndham. It's weird having moved from Melbourne to the Gold Coast and discovering that everyone in the Gold Coast has the same city council!

Edited by Ken
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...