LindaH27 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportsen/024683/toc_pdf/Theefficacy,fairness,timelinessandcostsoftheprocessingandgrantingofvisaclasseswhichprovidefororallowforfamilyandpartnerreunions.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindaH27 Posted March 29, 2022 Author Share Posted March 29, 2022 (edited) Just did a very quick read through so could have missed some things It still says processing time for contributory parent visas is 58 months ???? So basically it recommends setting up a new IT system so people can see where the true visa process is at, and to try to clear the backlog. Not much else. The Greens gave further recommendations ( not the report recommendation) the ones that stood out for me were Get rid of balance of family test (will add more parents to the queue?) Get rid of contributory visas and all non contributory to be dealt with in order of application. That one confuses me somewhat! If contributory no longer need to pay and are all merged into one queue which is dealt with in order of application, then all the 103 and 804 applications dating from 2012 onwards currently waiting will be dealt with before they reach the outstanding contributory ones which currently start from July 2016??? @Alan Collett am I reading this wrong - it was a very quick read through ! Edited March 29, 2022 by LindaH27 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyleL Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 I don't think its gonna have any impact soon tbh. The new budget bring skill stream back to 70%. This government just don't care about family visa whatsoever. QUOTE The Government will maintain the 2022-23 permanent Migration Program planning level at 160,000. Skill stream places will increase from the 2021-22 planning levels to 109,900, and account for around 70 per cent of the permanent Migration Program. QUOTE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palaceboy1 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 The quoting of time delays on the processing of parent visas is odd . The 143 states 58 months which is where they are processing now but the 103 states 30 years but they are processing 2012 now . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Collett Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 13 hours ago, KyleL said: I don't think its gonna have any impact soon tbh. The new budget bring skill stream back to 70%. This government just don't care about family visa whatsoever. QUOTE The Government will maintain the 2022-23 permanent Migration Program planning level at 160,000. Skill stream places will increase from the 2021-22 planning levels to 109,900, and account for around 70 per cent of the permanent Migration Program. QUOTE Also ... The Partner and Child visa categories are estimated to deliver 40,500 and 3,000 visas respectively (delivery of Partner and Child visas will be subject to demand and visa processing requirements); while 6,000 places will be available for Parent visas; and 500 places for Other Family visas. https://minister.homeaffairs.gov.au/AlexHawke/Pages/2022-23-budget-release.aspx No indication here that the present Federal Government is making any serious efforts to deal with the parent visa backlog, which will surely get a lot worse. Best regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisawright Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 16 hours ago, LindaH27 said: The Greens gave further recommendations ( not the report recommendation) the ones that stood out for me were Get rid of balance of family test (will add more parents to the queue?) Get rid of contributory visas and all non contributory to be dealt with in order of application. That one confuses me somewhat! The Greens can afford to make generous recommendations as they are never likely to form a government. I'd say they are taking an extreme position so that, if they find themselves holding the balance of power in future, they'll have some ground to give in negotiations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.