shawankit Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 WA Offlist Nominations in 2009 : Will these be on State Migration Plan? OR will these end up on Cat 5 ? if it does what is the benifit of SS ? :wacko: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest paulintrigg Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 It would be nice if someone knew what the State Migration Plan was (for each state)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gollywobbler Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 WA Offlist Nominations in 2009 : Will these be on State Migration Plan? OR will these end up on Cat 5 ? if it does what is the benifit of SS ? :wacko: Hi there If an occupation is in great need in WA, that occupation will be on the State sponsorship list already. Why would they put an occupation which is not needed urgently in WA into their State Migration Plan? Cheers Gill Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest paulintrigg Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 So, you think if the employment demands stay the same, when the state migration plan comes into effect, SS (on-list) applications will jump up the queue? And off-list will remain cat5. Lets see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rachbarlow Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 I think that the state migration plan WILL BE a form of the state sponsorship list. It will be different for each state according to their needs. That is my interpritate and to me the only thing that makes sence!!! Therefore pushing through the skills most needed into that state - the whole purpose of state sponsorship in the first place pre sept 23rd!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest goxian Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 As I understand, those occupations not on new SOL will be included in state migration plan. I guess it will be lower skilled occupations in need (ASCO 5 - 7) and those excluded from SOL? Something like ENSOL. Anyone know will these plans work similiar to ENS/RSMR? In other words, there shouldn't be points system. If so, maybe language requirement will be lowered too, and visa may not be permanent? Any ideas? Another thing, anyone knows does WA require 1 year recent experience in nominated occupation, or demand it as DIAC requirement? I guess this experience can be in any occupation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cherise Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 I also am worried about this, I was an off list occupation, wa sponsored me, what if im not on the states migration plan, primary school teachers are not in high demand in the metro area....... a little bit stressed, I keep telling myself that wa state sponsorship is my trump card but if these new lists come out and my occupation is not on it what then... waiting again :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houciaus2010 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Hi My first recommendation is to apply for visa as soon as possible because the SOL will be reviewed and then if your nominated occupation moves then it will be catastrophic ....:cry: Secondly for all who had their state nomination as me ,we might be touched by the amandements in two ways :1-We would be very happy if our nomination would be in the "migration stage plan" ..Jump to the second priority list :biggrin: 2- if your nomination occupation will not in the new migration stage plan then all the new amendments wouldn't affect you.:mask: Skills assesment :01/05/2009.Ielts :26/07/2009.WA ss:28/07/2009.WA approved:07/02/2010..DIAC APPLICATION 15/02/2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.