Andrew from Vista Financial Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 (edited) The chairman of the British Pensions in Australia (BPiA) organisation, James (“Jim”) Tilley has died in Sydney. He was 83. He will be remembered as a fiercely committed champion of British expats penalised by the UK’s frozen pensions policy. Full story here: https://www.smh.com.au/national/champion-of-british-expats-battled-for-improved-pensions-rights-20210823-p58l3c.html I know that although unsuccesful in his bid he has helped many UK expats understand their entitlements and make top up payments if appropriate. RIP Jim. Edited August 25, 2021 by Andrew from Vista Financial 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Collett Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 That's sad news. Jim was a passionate advocate for the rights of those who had paid NI contributions all their life, only to see their UK State pension entitlement frozen when they moved to Australia. RIP Jim. Best regards. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letmeinsoon Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 I've written to the UK all party committee on this matter. It's beyond time the UK Government agreed a state security agreement On 25/08/2021 at 22:26, Andrew from Vista Financial said: The chairman of the British Pensions in Australia (BPiA) organisation, James (“Jim”) Tilley has died in Sydney. He was 83. He will be remembered as a fiercely committed champion of British expats penalised by the UK’s frozen pensions policy. Full story here: https://www.smh.com.au/national/champion-of-british-expats-battled-for-improved-pensions-rights-20210823-p58l3c.html I know that although unsuccesful in his bid he has helped many UK expats understand their entitlements and make top up payments if appropriate. RIP Jim. Andrew, Do you have any contacts in BPiA - particularly those dealing with the 'state security agreement' or 'UK National Insurance contributions / state pensions'? It seems to me that the Australian Trade Minister (Dan Tehan) has about six months to demand the inclusion of a state security agreement inside the coming Free Trade Agreement (which is not a done deal by a long shot - thank you Liz Truss). We know from the published agreement in principle (AiP) regarding the FTA that the age a young worker can now work for 3 years in Australia or the UK - for the UK, that may mean the years a young person pays their NI payments to the UK Government on the proviso they would return to the UK, would result in the payments benefitting other UK pensioners onshore, or worse, in the USA or Philippines. I believe there's a legal case to be squared at the Government, the consideration being expat pensioners who now live in the Philippines or the US are awarded an 'unfrozen' (i.e. full) state pension. I note the Canadian minister who recently attempted to mediate a state security agreement with the UK failed. However - they were not negotiating a trade agreement. There's strong interest from Australia in agreeing a state security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted September 12, 2021 Share Posted September 12, 2021 On 08/09/2021 at 23:04, letmeinsoon said: I've written to the UK all party committee on this matter. It's beyond time the UK Government agreed a state security agreement Andrew, Do you have any contacts in BPiA - particularly those dealing with the 'state security agreement' or 'UK National Insurance contributions / state pensions'? It seems to me that the Australian Trade Minister (Dan Tehan) has about six months to demand the inclusion of a state security agreement inside the coming Free Trade Agreement (which is not a done deal by a long shot - thank you Liz Truss). We know from the published agreement in principle (AiP) regarding the FTA that the age a young worker can now work for 3 years in Australia or the UK - for the UK, that may mean the years a young person pays their NI payments to the UK Government on the proviso they would return to the UK, would result in the payments benefitting other UK pensioners onshore, or worse, in the USA or Philippines. I believe there's a legal case to be squared at the Government, the consideration being expat pensioners who now live in the Philippines or the US are awarded an 'unfrozen' (i.e. full) state pension. I note the Canadian minister who recently attempted to mediate a state security agreement with the UK failed. However - they were not negotiating a trade agreement. There's strong interest from Australia in agreeing a state security. I think you mean a social security agreement (Australia/ASIO already has a state security agreement with the UK via 5-eyes). However I'm not so sure that there is strong interest from Australia due to the cost to Australia this would entail. British pensioners would be better off but it's far from clear that the Australian tax payer would. The UK would insist on the Australian government providing more support to Australians in the UK in return for them providing more support to Britons in Australia. Somebody who worked for 20 years in the UK gets a UK old aged pension even if it is frozen. Somebody who worked for 20 years in Australia (and left Australia before being eligible to receive the pension) doesn't get a cent of Aged Pension from Australia even if their only income is social security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letmeinsoon Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 On 12/09/2021 at 09:04, Ken said: I think you mean a social security agreement (Australia/ASIO already has a state security agreement with the UK via 5-eyes). However I'm not so sure that there is strong interest from Australia due to the cost to Australia this would entail. British pensioners would be better off but it's far from clear that the Australian tax payer would. The UK would insist on the Australian government providing more support to Australians in the UK in return for them providing more support to Britons in Australia. Somebody who worked for 20 years in the UK gets a UK old aged pension even if it is frozen. Somebody who worked for 20 years in Australia (and left Australia before being eligible to receive the pension) doesn't get a cent of Aged Pension from Australia even if their only income is social security. Hi Ken Wow. If that's true, there's no hope of a reciprocal agreement! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 On 12/09/2021 at 18:04, Ken said: I think you mean a social security agreement (Australia/ASIO already has a state security agreement with the UK via 5-eyes). However I'm not so sure that there is strong interest from Australia due to the cost to Australia this would entail. British pensioners would be better off but it's far from clear that the Australian tax payer would. The UK would insist on the Australian government providing more support to Australians in the UK in return for them providing more support to Britons in Australia. Somebody who worked for 20 years in the UK gets a UK old aged pension even if it is frozen. Somebody who worked for 20 years in Australia (and left Australia before being eligible to receive the pension) doesn't get a cent of Aged Pension from Australia even if their only income is social security. They would if they returned to Australia. The benefit isn't a right. It is a welfare payment for those who really need help. I've worked here all my working life and probably won't get it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 16 hours ago, Parley said: They would if they returned to Australia. The benefit isn't a right. It is a welfare payment for those who really need help. I've worked here all my working life and probably won't get it either. And British pensioners would get all the increases to the old age pension if they returned to the UK. It's not any different except the UK government is more generous in that it at least makes some welfare payments to people overseas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 19 minutes ago, Ken said: And British pensioners would get all the increases to the old age pension if they returned to the UK. It's not any different except the UK government is more generous in that it at least makes some welfare payments to people overseas. The UK is hardly being generous. Australia has terminated the Agreement because the UK Government refuses to change its policy of not indexing pensions in Australia, even though it does index pensions paid in some countries with which it has Agreements. The Australian Government has made considerable efforts over the last decade to get the UK to re-negotiate the Agreement to address the indexation problem but the UK has refused all our efforts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 Just now, Parley said: The UK is hardly being generous. Australia has terminated the Agreement because the UK Government refuses to change its policy of not indexing pensions in Australia, even though it does index pensions paid in some countries with which it has Agreements. The Australian Government has made considerable efforts over the last decade to get the UK to re-negotiate the Agreement to address the indexation problem but the UK has refused all our efforts. I am sure that the British government is spending more on welfare payments to people in Australia than the Australian government is spending on welfare payments to people in the UK which means they are being generous. If however the Australian government can prove otherwise then they really need to negotiate harder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 5 minutes ago, Ken said: I am sure that the British government is spending more on welfare payments to people in Australia than the Australian government is spending on welfare payments to people in the UK which means they are being generous. If however the Australian government can prove otherwise then they really need to negotiate harder. Well that is obvious. A lot more people in the UK want to move to Australia than vice versa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.