Jump to content

millski88

Members
  • Posts

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by millski88

  1. Yeah exactly... the same would apply if it was the same field of work (and same employer) on the D.E. app
  2. Hopefully it's just our speculation creating necessary hearsay.. Probably not very helpful in reality, but it's hard not to get frustrated when you hear stuff like that!
  3. I can see that a huge influx of direct entry applications could be ‘high risk’, but hopefully that term isn’t applied to TRT stream applications. That’d be pretty difficult to swallow. It’s like admitting the 457 processes were lax to begin with, which is not something that could be the fault of the applicant nor of the nominating employer, and doesn’t exactly ring true of a ‘grandfathering agreement’. If you and your employer met the requirements for 457 and have stuck to the rules for TRT stream agreement, then that’s pretty black and white if you ask me. How could you suddenly be higher risk now than you were when your 457 was granted?
  4. Mine's the same, weird! Wonder what's going on there. To be honest though, since anyone mentioned it on here i'd never thought to check that date. It could have been that way for a while!
  5. I think that's just the processing office. I'm in VIC and so far my communication has been from NSW PESE. In saying that though, I'm not sure most on that spreadsheet are correct in stating the processing office. If you read the note at the bottom - the automated letters/emails may come from NSW PESE but only when you have a CO assigned will you learn where your application is actually being processed (hence i removed 'NSW PESE' from my row for now).
  6. I think the calculation of waiting times are pretty straightforward to understand. As stated, it’s timelines across the visa type in brackets of 75% complete and 90% complete, with that extra 10% allowing room for (potentially extreme) outliers. It’s more a question of what is the strategy as far as I’m concerned. Based on what is published regarding the post-April influx, i think it's likely a case of keeping those 75/90% brackets looking respectable. Presumably that’s what is audited. If the whole workforce had stopped to purely focus on the 16k applications from June, just imagine what impact that would have had on those 75/90% timeline brackets. It’s utterly unfair, and a huge stress and uncertainty for those in that pack I’m sure, but there is some sort of skewed logic to why DIBP would need to do it.
  7. If it's strategic clearing of the new applications at play, the published processing times will still be accurate.
  8. Gah! what happened to Oct 2017 sheet?? Looks like rows have been hidden, but i can't seem to 'unhide' https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1INy6sxuUIisgLOT7CcskWLjQjHV_6yVvUBRHceWE_a0/edit#gid=1445656385
  9. Thanks AJSAJS! I suppose it's mainly if it was granted whilst we're out of the country, or it was due to be granted and we we're offshore, when we had applied onshore. If that happened would i thought it might mess things up, or that i might be given a window to return.
  10. Couple of general visa quiz questions whilst we wait? I will ask these of the department next time I call, but since we’ve got a community of experts right here: I have a trip planned to the UK in August 2018 for nearly a month. Currently 4 months in to 186 waiting, our 457s still run until mid-2019. Q1 – Am I correct in thinking we do not need to switch to Bridging Visa B to travel outside of AU? Do the 457 rules for travel stay in effect until they expire, and trump any bridging visa rules in the meantime? Q2 – If our 186 was opened during the time we’re away, in August, what would happen? We’re due to be away just shy of a month total. Would I have to quickly return to Aus? Thanks 186 crew for any insight!
  11. ... May/June 2017, aka once people had got their apps together immediately after the Turnbull government's announcements?
  12. I'm not sure if there's any use even speculating on the system/strategy in place here, but i can't help but ponder. Perhaps there had been a few cases submitted back in April 2016 which are now proving very difficult to either grant or refuse, and so newer cases are cherry picked/favoured over the ones in between in order to bring averages down for the sake of audits? If the spreadsheet is up to date it seems like a pretty illogical pattern of activity! or perhaps it's simply not up to date? I wonder how many are actually in progress and just not updated on there.
  13. I'm pretty new round here, and have experienced quicker-than-lower-end estimates in the past... just got a bit overexcited
  14. You can only hope. But yes, agreed - I feel pretty bad for whomever is stuck in that April 2016 application!
  15. When you email the processing office you get a bounce back email, and the last sentence at the bottom of this email is updated with the current processing period. This is often shared with the group on here and is displayed on column A on the first sheet ('Status') of the Google Sheets tracker doc - here. As you can see it was last updated 8th Jan.
  16. Understood and yes, i'm in the "addicted phase".... i'll prob still be checking back in like 1-2 years, at which point i'm sure i'll be less enthusiastic
  17. Don't really understand your first reply, but: As of 8th January 2018 - "Currently processing applications between April 2016 and Sept 2017" Therefore, it's not too much of a stretch to suggest it'd now be on Oct 2017, is it? Just interested in whether anyone had up to date info. With a decision ready application, why shouldn't i enquire about this?
  18. Anyone got the latest Processing Period to hand? Are we on "to Oct 2017" yet?
×
×
  • Create New...