miguelrg Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Hey Guys, Just wanted to know which is better to get assessed as vetassess don't have trade tests as such, also the difference in prices? I am also considering TRA pathway c i think, 5 years informal apprenticeship except i don't know if i have strong enough case, here is my work history and let me know what you think College 2004- 8 months of 1 day in college doing 9 hours starting my course in barbering College 2006 - 1 year completing my barbering qualification 1 day in college 9 hours Formal training - working as an apprentice for 5 months in 2004 training everyday with cuts, colours, blow drys in a unisex salon taking my hours way over 1500 training Work 2005 - late 2007 2 1/2 years in **** Men's hairdressing - job role - hairdresser, assistant manager - manager - educator to apprentices work late 2007 - early 2008 mark powells men's hair - job role stylist - cutting colouring shaves blow drys work 2008 - april - october - a sydney salon as a stylist all aspects of hairdressing late 2008 - early 2009- manager of a men;s hairdressers June 2009 - present - barber/stylist/shaver at one of londons tops salons I can get references and written confirmation for all my work but do you think this is a strong enough case and who should i go to? Do you think i should get my trades assessed for pathway e as its really expensive? Any help appreciated, sorry if it's a bit scattered Miguel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jools123 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 hi,ive just done mine thru tra with the help of an agent as mine was a bit like yours, they want proofof either an apprentiship or work experience, i would also try to hava a free consultation with some agents as well as post this on the hairdressing thread theres bound to be someone on there that could help you more jools x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.