Bound4Tassie Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-39650320 Is it art ? Is it OK? Does it provoke thought about why is it OK to kill for food but maybe not for art/entertainment? I can't fathom why people would want to volunteer to be covered in blood. Or who wants to look at it. But then in another piece of so called art people were actually going to pay to be crucified so there's no accounting for taste and nowt as queer as folk. The (poor) cow's fate was already sealed....it was always going to be slaughtered. I don't like it. It's not art to me. But then I don't eat meat either. Is it hypocritical for meat eaters to object to this bloody mess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 No it isn't hypocritical. Killing an animal humanely and treating it with dignity is very different to this display. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toots Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Hermann Nitsch just wants his 15 minutes of fame. He is one of those so called controversial artists. Take Damien Hirst for example. He's made millions from his art work and little old philistine that I am wouldn't give you 5 cents for any of his stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Pom Queen Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 It is disgusting and I can't imagine anyone wanting to go and see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.