jdad84 Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 So, from a little research (ok, a quick google) I see that: Public Benevolent Institutions (PBI) Public and Private Hospitals Health Promotion Charities (HPC) Benefit from salary packaging for things such as: Car lease, laptop, mortgage etc. I wondered, from private companies who are not part of the above list, are there any other tax-efficient 'salary packaging' schemes or is it just the above?? Thanks, J SOURCES: 1. http://www.cbb.com.au/salary-packaging/for-employees 2. http://careers.shpa.org.au/Hospital-Pharmacy/Salaries-and-Conditions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickyNook Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Private companies can 'salary package' whatever they want - however they have to pay fringe benefits tax on anything that they provide tax-free to their employees (obviously so the ATO doesn't miss out) so it's not really cost effective for them to do it. Some companies do offer some tax-free perks and pay the FBT, of course. Hospitals and charities, being non-profit-making organisations, have different tax arrangements and can legitimately offer employees much more in the way of tax-free perks. Charities do it to make up for the lower salaries they pay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freckleface Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Lots of companies offer salary packaging with many people using it for cars and additional superannuation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdad84 Posted October 27, 2013 Author Share Posted October 27, 2013 Lots of companies offer salary packaging with many people using it for cars and additional superannuation. I think I understand. My wife is still at the negotiation phase and its a rather large telecoms company so perhaps there's scope to negotiate some benefits. Thanks, J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.