wendyjoe1026

It seems like that the average waiting time for transition application is much less than Direct Entry. Those Auguest/September applications in progress or finalized are all via transition stream. Is it a priority here ?

Go ahead to add yourself and that is what I did. The spreedsheet does save your edits automatically. Just ensure that your info fits in the right order (sorted by nomination submission date).

Thank you for sharing your story, I am sure you will get your 190 PR, otherwise, the immigration officer woundn't have asked you to fill the form. Your wife's health condition should not be a problem as it all happed back in 2003. My case will be referred to a Medical Officer of Commonhealth for assessment. I think what I can do here is to argue that I don't have cancer but precancerous lesion which is cured.

Thank you Ali for the information, that is very helpful.

Thank you, do you have the contact info of George Lombard.

Thank you, do you have the contact info of Geroge Lombard ?

I am not sure if someone here can help me out with my question, but I am hopeing that I may get valuable info. I am in the progress of lodging my 186 visa (permanent resident visa). However, just two months ago, I found two GGOs (ground-glass nodule) in my lung during a regular health check and the doctor suggested that I removed those GGOs. The pathological result indicated that those two GGOs were Stage 0 of lung cancer which was called AIS (Adenocarcinoma in situ). As AIS is categorized as precancerous lesion according to the new WHO classification, I am technically cured. No follow-up treatment is required. My doctor told me that AIS has a great prognosis, with 100% 5 year survival rate. However, I am still worried that I may fail the health examination and the Visa Officer may refuse my application. I am 100% certain that my health condition will be assessed by MOC, but I am just not quite confident that MOC has the expertise to evaluate my condition. A chest surgeon may know what AIS (Adenocarcinoma in situ) is, but I am not sure whether a MOC has the capability to evaluate. Therefore, I wonder: -As the pathological result indicates that those two GGOs are AIS, ( precancerous lesion), technically speakding, the are pre-cancer. So, the MOC should not caculate the potential cost of healthcare based on the "Notes for guildance" for lung cancer, right ? -Is there anything I can do at this point to help ? For example, by providing medical evidence that AIS does not require further treatment and the 5 year prognosis is 100% ? Thank you Joe