Danny842003 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Danny 842003 I would think this is very relevant, given that the changes were announced in the budget, presumably to save the government money. If they don't want them then why not prevent all parents from emigrating unless they pay the large CPV charge? Why just pick on one section of parents, and overlook another larger section who will in the long run cost more money? And I am not talking about migrants who are allowed in on humanitarian grounds, of course, I am not suggesting this is wrong. I am talking about people who come over on skilled visas, but who, because they financially support their parents, are allowed to add them to the applications as dependants. Danny Well I don't know why they haven't closed down both avenues, but my point is just because they haven't closed down one does not mean its wrong for them to close the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.