mateo

So you saying thats true regardless of what year (i.e 2012-13) 485 visa was granted ?

Hi all, I have heard this statement a few times that if someone is on 485 visa it is safe to assume that they meet the study requirement therefore they can claim 5 points for it, is this correct ?

No I don't it was just recently submitted (last week), so correcting it doesn't change 'date of effect' ?

I just realized that I have mistyped my ielts Test Report number, would that be an issue ?? I thought of updating the EOI but i was afraid it might change the submission date:dull:

what happens when 485 is about to run out while another one (lets say 189) is being processed?

Well as long as they have reasonable fees and get the job done I think they deserve every single penny then.

I have but couldn't get through, also send an email and got nothing, hence I asked here

What are their fees? Anyone wouldn't mind sharing that?

and they are PR sponsorship visas regardless of the location, right ?

Im on a TR visa at the moment 485, so is there a sponsorship visa for Melbourne ?

Is there A link or a booklet that covers the sponsorship visas?cos when I tried searching for it it takes me to 457 visa I assume this is not the right visa since this opportunity is in Melbourne not regional??

Hi guys, I've finally found an employer who is willing to sponsor me in IT, I wanted to know what are the requirements for this visa, like what does the employer has to do? what do I have to do? I know I have to stay with that company for 2 years but don't know more then that Regarding the salary is there a specific amount he has to pay to meet a criteria set by DIAC? Is sponsorship visa processed any quicker then other visas ? Thank in advance for your help!

thanks for the replies guys, hopefully my occupation will remain in the list otherwise i think im stuffed

so does that mean there is no point for me to apply for systems analyst before July 2013:sad:??

Hi wrussell, Thank you for your help. We filled the application correctly as far as I am concerned and there wasn't due to lack of documentation. One of their documents states this: "Clause 679.224 is a primary criterion to be satisfied at the time of decision. - 6 - Clause 679.224 states that: The applicant satisfies the Minister that the expressed intention to only visit Australia is genuine." To me it seems that sometimes they make decision all randomly with absolutely no evidence of refusal. Simply because they can. I'm willing to pay any amount of money they ask just to assure the immi she will be going back before her visa expires.