Jump to content

insizer

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by insizer

  1. No offense was ever taken. I was just understanding what you or others believe the legal outcomes would be and the practical impact. There is of course the reality that some will not qualify under the current visa subclass options and then there is the lost time of course which is difficult to put a value on so a legal option is a last desperate attempt to keep the applications alive. But, I would restate that legal action would have made a bigger difference when the changes were first implemented and retroactively applied. Good luck...

     

    Drowning man catches at a straw

  2. We did not think of a legal battle earlier, because we thought they will process our applications one fine day. But now our hopes are gone.

    Now is the time to fight this. I will contribute to this wholeheartedly even if they do not consider my application, but some of our team members ,at least 1 of us get the benefit of our effort.

    I am in need to migrate to Australia. But if I can become a seed and help someone else , I would not be reluctant to do so. Even if they decide to process 10 applications per year, 10 of us will full fill their desire.

    I do not try to offend you. I respect your view. At the same time I wish to support this fight and become a candle even to future applicants.

     

    You r the true soul.for himself is everyone but good people always ready to do for cumminty whatever they can

  3. FYI ITS NOT over as yet. last time cap and cease was successful they the people accepted the decision and hence were defeated. I DONT want to dishearten anybody but fact is a fact. It's over for people who accept refunds. Consulted with one of the best barristers of Australia and he has won similar cases in NZ and Australia too. He reverted back that if you read the cap and cease wordings on border.gov.au website its mentioning for financial year. Will be fighting now the case in the court so I would urge whosoever wants to join they would have to take decision fast. The more we are the better the situation. Barrister reverted back that we need to be at least 100 people to make impact may be more. Also, he reverted we have bright chances of winning and that am thankful to Ilaria for supporting us always. At this hour, I will say that don't loosen your heart I know i have been in this situation just like you but that doesn't mean I will take my defeat this way.

     

    We need to take decision soon how many are we as we need to file the case ASAP. Thanks and Regards

     

    Gagandeep Singh

     

    keep it up GAGAN, nothing comes easily.count me ,i m also a severe victim of s39 but have difference of 5 years.it was june 2010 when i was deeply sorrowed by this action taken by prev labor's dictator immi minister chris evans.he used it only because they doesnt want more immigrants to be selected under liberal policies.so they choose a non-humanitarian and cheap way to get rid of all pre sept applicants and now LIBERAL has only revoke this instrument again to remind of labor;s injustice .in fact ,by this they also want this instrument to b vanished now.that is possible only if people challenge instrument 39 in any way .fact behind to me is LIBERAL'S support of anti asylum policy coz they always encouraged skilled people over asylum .but opposition have halted their efforts toward stopping boat migration in court .so now they are using labor's own weapon of cap and cease against them through igniting the buried agenda.but my point of view in reality they r defending ours through back door to stand against .

    fight for right is nature of brave hearted.

×
×
  • Create New...