Vipa23

13 hours ago, Hex said:

@Dhakalbinod Unless I miss-understand your question, the date is included within the quoted text: 

- "Recieved request s56 : 5 June2019 ( health checks)"

@Hexthank you 

Hi everyone, my PR was granted yesterday.

Here is my timeline:

Pastry cook

186TRT

NSW

HR country

Nomination -Visa applied: 26 June2017

Nomnation refused: 16 June 18 ( training benchmarks issue)

Reapplied Nomination and Visa: 24 October 2018

 Nomination approved : 31 May 2019

Recieved request s56 : 5 June2019 ( health checks)

Visa granted: 15 July 2019

NSW pese team 13

8 hours ago, hongkoknger said:

I just saw the team! 

Mine's also team 13! You can see that from one of the messages under your immi a/c when they request for s56. I submitted around the same time as you. Hopefully, some news soon

I've got team 13 as well. Received a request for s56 5/6/19  , submitted on 16/6/19 and still waiting for a decision. 

On 14/03/2019 at 22:28, GTRZ said:

Hi,

MA said that my employer did not pay required full training amount to satisfy bench mark A for 2017/2018 period. When I asked from him to pay it he said he can't back paid it for 2017/2018 because the  TAFE he been paid training fees not flexible to accept the payments for previous financial year.IF Anybody in hear know any TAFE who will accept the payment for last financial year, please be kind enough to PM me the details. It should need to be for Training benchmark A.

Big help!!!!

On 14/03/2019 at 22:28, GTRZ said:

Hi,

MA said that my employer did not pay required full training amount to satisfy bench mark A for 2017/2018 period. When I asked from him to pay it he said he can't back paid it for 2017/2018 because the  TAFE he been paid training fees not flexible to accept the payments for previous financial year.IF Anybody in hear know any TAFE who will accept the payment for last financial year, please be kind enough to PM me the details. It should need to be for Training benchmark A.

Big help!!!!

Hi GTRZ

I heard that TAFE Queensland is able to do it (back date contributions).

Anyway I'm wondering why do you need to provide training expenditures because training benchmarks has been replaced by SAF since 12 August 18 . Hence training evidences are no longer considered after that time. Please correct me if I'm wrong. 

On 09/03/2019 at 13:26, Diggy singh said:

Hi  mate. I work in a big wholesale bakery factory. They walked around spoke to other employees about me.With my boss. They asked, How did he hire me. When. Duties and responsibilities everything.checked companies documents.i was on a  leave. So they called me and asked everything about my job. Duties. My salary. How I get paid, how much. My annual leave. Sick leave. Am working overtime. Who else are working. Everthing about my job. 20 mins interview.and in the end asked me about my bank statement where I  get paid.Totally grilled everyone. Good luck mate. Hope and pray everyone passes through this time and gets their residency.

Hi Diggy Singh , may I ask which is state you applied? 

Thanks

11 hours ago, Ash1983 said:

Cant really remember,but right now showing 12 -13 months

All good, thanks for reply.

8 hours ago, Ash1983 said:

Occupation : cook

state : Vic

stream : 457 186 TRT

applicants : 2

Ens visa and nomination applied : 27 Aug 2018

Nomination approved : 11 Feb 2019

last update : 18 Feb 2019

requested documents : 18 Feb 2019(even documents were already attached)

immi status : initial assessment

 

1. I would like to know what is time frame PR might me granted.

Thank you

 

@Ash1983  what was the processing time shown when you lodged Nomination and visa application? 

11 hours ago, Mark11 said:

Hi cpp I am about to apply for my env 186 from 457 in the new year however I am worried that I’n the 2 years the training benchmark was not met.

As the new rules have come in abolishing the 1% are they still applicable.

Any advice would be great 

Regards 

mark 

Training benchmarks are no longer required since 12.8.18

On 09/12/2018 at 10:06, CPP said:

 

Thanks for the reply guys. So we knew the new benchmark got tougher than before, so we paid extra attention to it. But CO was just super picky on this, so the reasons were;

1. There were couple of invoices that a trainer came to the company and gave us training about teaching (we are a very small school), and CO said there is no written evidence that those training were given to actual 'PR' holder staff or citizen staff on the invoice. Like, who writes that some product is for PR or citizen holder on the invoice? AND we could more than be happy to provide extra documents if CO asked.

2. Training benchmarks were paid on time. But CO said there is no evidence that it was actually paid from the company's account. We provided our MA bank statements of specific period of training benchmarks were paid, but our MA didn't submit it, but again, if CO asked it, we could have sent those evidences right away.

Well it is too late for me, but they really do refuse nominations without asking further documents, so keep that in mind folks.  

HI CCP,

So sorry to hear about your situation. My reply might be too late now as I just found your post today.However I just wanna share my case.

My case is exactly the same as you. I got my nomination refused in June2018(Ens186 Pastrycook transits from 457). The reasons of refusal was that there was insufficient evidence (receipts, a written report of the training outcome) to show that PR or Citizen were giving training. After having consultations from 2 migration agents and 2 migration lawyers,then I decided to reapply as those migration specialists said there is the best option for me so far. The positive point for reapply option is that  the laws have chance. So.if you lodge a nomination application after 12 August 2018 the case officer are now not required to assess the training benchmark requirements as all businesses that nominate permanent or temporary staff must simply pay the training contribution charge( $3,000 for business with a turnover  less than 10 million.

Anyway my case still has risks as the refusal decision of the previous nomination is on record and it could be adverse information and this can affect to the new nomination so the best way to do is providing  a strong submission about the previous training issue. Or if I'm lucky , the case officer might not give  weight to the training benchmark issue on the record as it has been discarded by the new laws. Finger cross and always have a good hope! 

What I want to tell you is that don't just stick on one migration agent but seek a lot of second opinions from several agents or even lawyers to ensure you get the best solution. Good luck!