Jump to content

Melbournes Richest and Poorest Suburbs


Guest The Pom Queen

Recommended Posts

Guest The Pom Queen

The divide between Melbourne's richest and poorest suburbs is widening.

New data shows average incomes are growing much faster in the wealthy inner-east and south than in less advantaged outer areas.

The growing gap is broadly consistent across the city's 10 wealthiest and 10 poorest suburbs, measured by income.

With the exception of Portsea, the richest areas could be found in a band between Kew and Canterbury in the east down to Albert Park and Brighton on the bay. They recorded average income growth of between 63 and 94 per cent.

Incomes also rose in the poorest areas but, with the exception of Rosebud West on the Mornington Peninsula, at a slower rate.

Grouped in clusters in the south-east, north-west and west, these suburbs – including Broadmeadows, Doveton and Frankston North – had an average rise of between 35 and 51 per cent.

Grattan Institute chief executive John Daley said the data matched work by the think tank showing Melbourne was becoming more segregated between the "haves" in the city and the "have much less" further out.

The gap applies not just to income and income growth, but also education levels and female workforce participation rate.

"Yes, that segregation is going on, and yes, that's a problem," Mr Daley said.

He said there was also a growing gap in incomes within postcodes in Melbourne, particularly in the inner-city.

But he stressed the level of inequality in Australia was nowhere near as pronounced as in the US. Incomes in poorer suburbs in Australia grew by about 30 per cent over a decade. In America, wages have not increased for the bottom half in that time.

The gap between Melbourne's richest and poorest suburbs is growing fast.

The gap between Melbourne's richest and poorest suburbs is growing fast. Photo: Paul Rovere

Monash University senior economics lecturer Gennadi Kazakevitch said the growing inequality was consistent with international trends, though the gap was generally less in Australia than elsewhere. 

In terms of inequality and welfare safety nets, Dr Kazakevitch said Australia lay exactly in the middle between the US and northern Europe. He said a key question was whether living standards for those on lower incomes were increasing.

For no obvious reason, the largest and the smallest growth in incomes over the 11 years were recorded in nearby suburbs in Melbourne's outer north.

The residents of Yarrambat enjoyed an average 124 per cent jump in what they earned, from nearly $40,000 to almost $90,000.

But the people of Wollert, just 10 kilometres away, saw their incomes creep up only 2 per cent to $48,716.

The list of the 10 highest-earning Melbourne postcodes remains much the same as it did about a decade ago, but there has been one drop-out. 

Postcode 3004, which takes in the section of the city that looks out on St Kilda Road, was ranked six for average taxable income back then, but it has been left behind by other affluent postcodes and now ranks at number 23.

Postcode Area Average income
3142 Toorak 173,808
3944 Portsea/Blackwarry 156,669
3186 Brighton 124,009
3206 Albert Park 119,353
3144 Malvern/Kooyong 115,791
3126 Canterbury 115,520
3002 East Melbourne 114,843
3143 Armadale 107,661
3101 Kew North/Studley Park 99,748
3141 South Yarra 98,625

 

And the 10 lowest-earning postcodes
Postcode Area Average income
3171 Springvale 36,421
3048 Coolaroo/Meadow Heights 37,593
3047 Broadmeadows/Dallas 37,610
3177 Doveton 38,991
3021 St Albans East/Kealba/Kings Park 39,793
3061 Campbellfield 40,117
3019 Braybrook 40,139
3200 Frankston North 40,392
3174 Noble Park 40,574
3940 Rosebud West 40,816
Data: Australian Taxation Office. Figures are for taxable income in 2014/15. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Portsea would be 'second homes', or holiday houses I think. My daughter's parents have a place there(holiday house) and bought it cheaply over 10 years ago- now worth well over a mill.  Funny how things go. One of my daughters bought a place in Mt Waverley which is now worth 2.5 mill - ridiculous but v.nice for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest The Pom Queen

I'm surprised Springvale was on there, I wouldn't want to live there but I would have thought there was a lot of foreign and older money. 

Frankston North and Doveton I totally agree with I think 99% of people are probably on Centrelink. Actually I'm probably being unfair as it's years since we lived down there.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...