Skillselect ENS 186 Timeline

[Sheb]

17 hours ago, Salikala said:

Finally got my mail this morning 

9.29Am Nomination approval 

10.01Am Pr granted..

No documents requested...!!! 

Congrats mate.. 

[sydneyishuk]

26 minutes ago, Deep1984 said:

When we open 186 timesheet  shows old until Oct 2017. Where we find 2018 one

There are tabs in the 186 timeline (see at the bottom of sheet) - you can select the different months and the year is indicated too.

Update your signature to include the following - (instructions in my signature below)

Occupation: 
State: 
Birth Country: 
Stream: 
Number of applicants: 
ENS 186 Nomination applied: 
Visa Application submitted:
IMMI Status: 
Processing Office: 

 

[Royal1]

Hi guys

Anyone got requested natural justice s57?

[Salikala]

1 hour ago, sydneyishuk said:

@Salikala and to others with recent PR grants - big congrats! Please make sure you update your signature stating your visa grant date  

Thanks mate I was worried but early morning on work place I received a call from my MA and he said your nomination approved after one hour he again called me and said PR granted too

[apoudel35]

11 minutes ago, Royal1 said:

Hi guys

Anyone got requested natural justice s57?

What was you s57 natural justice for,did you had any breach of your 457 visa ?

[sydneyishuk]

30 minutes ago, Royal1 said:

Hi guys

Anyone got requested natural justice s57?

I believe that this is in regards that the department may think you have breached some visa conditions - have they given any more information regarding this so can better assist?

Also what is your occupation?

[Laure]

Hello

just a little question 

Is Wa residency applications are processed by WA co ?

thank you

[Beingme]

Just now, Laure said:

Hello

just a little question 

Is Wa residency applications are processed by WA co ?

thank you

No one of my friends from WA got his processed by VIC PeSe.

[melal]

Hi Guys,

Just a question I am the one who received that famous email on 4th Apr (No response yet) just wondering that email came from NSW PSE but i applied from Vic and live in Melbourne how come my application is going to be processed in NSW anybody with same situation?

[sydneyishuk]

5 minutes ago, melal said:

Hi Guys,

Just a question I am the one who received that famous email on 4th Apr (No response yet) just wondering that email came from NSW PSE but i applied from Vic and live in Melbourne how come my application is going to be processed in NSW anybody with same situation?

Hi Melal,

Your application can be processed in any state, even just look at the post above yours someone in WA got granted by NSW processing department.

[Royal1]

1 hour ago, sydneyishuk said:

I believe that this is in regards that the department may think you have breached some visa conditions - have they given any more information regarding this so can better assist?

Also what is your occupation?

I have an alias that I use at work but it was never used on any legal documents that’s why I didn’t mention it in Form 80.

The CO is asking why wasn’t it mentioned.

Any suggestions on what can be provided.

 

[Andytomas]

On 22/04/2019 at 13:51, Gui Eloi said:

Hey guys, I have been a quiet reader for a while, but I just got my nomination approved and I have some questions about it.

Do you guys know roughly how long it takes to have your visa accessed after your nomination is approved?
And I also would like to know how relevant is that? I'm celebrating either way because it is a step towards our golds ( me and my wife's ) but does this means the hardest part is passed and I'll probably get my visa soon?

Thanks in advance. 

Congratulations!!!

when did you receive the email regarding your nomination approved? 

Did you receive the email from Immi the 04/04/19

Hi guys, bad news Immi refused my nomination because insufficient training. Impossible because when applied for 457 we put that my boss would do the training plus external training by other company. We sent receive and all the proof but still they didn’t approve. 

Any advice? I think they did a mistake. 

What can I do?

 

thanks

[Royal1]

1 hour ago, sydneyishuk said:

I believe that this is in regards that the department may think you have breached some visa conditions - have they given any more information regarding this so can better assist?

Also what is your occupation?

I have an alias that I use at work but it was never used on any legal documents that’s why I didn’t mention it in Form 80.

The CO is asking why wasn’t it mentioned.

 Any suggestions on what can be provided.

[sydneyishuk]

2 minutes ago, Royal1 said:

I have an alias that I use at work but it was never used on any legal documents that’s why I didn’t mention it in Form 80.

The CO is asking why wasn’t it mentioned.

Any suggestions on what can be provided.

 

Do you have a Migration Agent? As would always recommend to seek professional migration advice.

Can you elaborate on your Alias at work...  to what extent is it used? Is it on your payslips/official employment documents etc? or just like a Nick Name?

In this case I would get your company to provide a letter to the department (on company letter head) explaining that you are known as "alias" at work - however you are legally known as.... 

Also you could include a statutory declaration - explain truthfully why it was not disclosed - you could also submit the Form 1023 ( https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/form-listing/forms/1023.pdf ) Notification of incorrect answer and try to correct it.

 

[sydneyishuk]

18 minutes ago, Andytomas said:

Congratulations!!!

when did you receive the email regarding your nomination approved? 

Did you receive the email from Immi the 04/04/19

Hi guys, bad news Immi refused my nomination because insufficient training. Impossible because when applied for 457 we put that my boss would do the training plus external training by other company. We sent receive and all the proof but still they didn’t approve. 

Any advice? I think they did a mistake. 

What can I do?

 

thanks

Sorry to hear about the refusal  

Maybe the $ spent on training didn't meet the benchmark or could be another reason? 

Did you use an MA?

The Training Benchmark system requires sponsors to demonstrate expenditure of:

• an amount equivalent to 2% of gross payroll towards a training fund, such as a donation to a TAFE college or University; or
• an amount equivalent to 1% of gross payroll on training Australian staff.

Existing sponsors are required to meet the Training Benchmarks either on the anniversary of their sponsorship or in each financial year.

Options;

1. Your employer can appeal the refusal - only would recommend if 100% you believe that immi made mistake - this is a loong process though could be 1/2 years or more to get the appeal.
2. Are you still on 457 visa? is it a possibility to submit a new application? I know its at great expense but likely to be processed quicker than the appeal route. Only thing is Employer will need to pay the SAF.
3. If on a bridging visa already (that is if your 457 has already expired) bit of a trickier process you can re-apply but you will be on bridging visa C - which means no travel!

Speak to some Migration Lawyers/Agents and assess the options best for you - would definitely recommend specialist advise under the circumstances.

Wish you all the best and again so sorry - I understand went through a nomination refusal too 

Edited May 3, 2019 by sydneyishuk

[Kashif.Iqbal]

New Direction No 81 (Order of Consideration – Certain Skilled Migration Visas): replaces Direction No 74; sets the order of processing of applications for visa subclasses 189, 190, 489, 186 and 187; sets the order of processing of nomination applications for visa subclasses 186 and 187 New Direction No 81 replaces Direction No 74. Although the new direction has only just become available on Legendcom, it has commenced on 27 March 2019 and includes the following provisions: 7. Order for considering nominations 1. The following processing priorities (with highest priority listed first) should be given due regard to in relation to nominations for visas that are specified in Schedule A and Schedule B: a) nominations lodged on or after 18 March 2018; b) nominations lodged before 18 March 2018. 2. Within these priorities, the following processing priorities should be given due regard: a) nominations lodged in relation to a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa by an employer who is a party to a labour agreement under a Designated Area Migration Agreement or a Global Talent Scheme agreement; b) nominations lodged in relation to a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa. Within this priority, nominations lodged by approved sponsors with Accredited Status should be given precedence; c) nominations lodged in relation to a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa where the nominated position is located in regional Australia. Within this priority, nominations by an approved sponsor with Accredited Status, and nominations lodged by a party to a labour agreement not mentioned in paragraph (a), are to be given precedence; d) all other nominations. Within this priority, Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) nominations by an approved sponsor with Accredited Status, and nominations lodged by a party to a labour agreement not mentioned in paragraphs (a) or (c), are to be given precedence. 8. Order for considering visa applications 3. The following processing priorities (with highest priority listed first) should be given due regard to in relation to applications for visas that are specified in Schedule A and Schedule B: a) applications lodged on or after 18 March 2018; b) applications lodged before 18 March 2018. 4. Within these priorities, the following processing priorities should be applied: a) visa applications for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa where the applicant is nominated by an employer who is a party to a labour agreement under a Designated Area Migration Agreement or a Global Talent Scheme agreement. b) visa applications for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa. Within this priority, visa applications where the applicant is nominated by an approved sponsor with Accredited Status are to be given precedence; c) visa applications for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa where the nominated position is located in regional Australia. Within this priority, visa applications where the applicant is nominated by an approved sponsor with Accredited Status, or nominated by a party to a labour agreement not mentioned in paragraph (a) above, are to be given precedence; d) visa applications for a Subclass 489 (Skilled – Regional (Provisional)) visa where the applicant is nominated by a State or Territory government agency; e) visa applications for a Subclass 489 (Skilled – Regional (Provisional)) visa where the applicant is sponsored by an eligible relative; f) visa applications for a Subclass 190 (Skilled – Nominated) visa; g) visa applications where the visa applicant is sponsored or nominated by employers. Within this priority, Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa applications where the applicant is nominated by an approved sponsor with Accredited Status, or nominated by a party to a labour agreement not mentioned in paragraphs (a) or (c) above, have precedence; h) visa applications where the applicant’s nominated occupation is on the Medium and Long-term Strategic Skills List and applications for Subclass 885 (Skilled – Independent), Subclass 886 (Skilled – Sponsored) and Subclass 487 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored) visas. Within this priority, Subclass 189 (Skilled – Independent) visa applications in the Points-test stream are to be given precedence; i) all other visa applications. 9. If a Section 85 cap applies 1. Applications for a visa may be affected by a section 85 cap that allows processing to be conducted but prevents the grant of visas beyond a specified number in a specified time period. 2. In deciding the order for considering and disposing of visa applications (or reviewing decisions pertaining to such applications) when affected by a section 85 cap, the applications to which this Direction specifically applies should be given priority in the order as provided for above. 3. This Direction prevails over any other directions under section 499 of the Act that outline the order of consideration for visa applications not described in this Direction. 10. Schedule A 1. The following visas (referred to for the purposes of this Direction as specified General Skilled Migration visas) are specified : a) Subclass 175 (Skilled –– Independent); b) Subclass 176 (Skilled – Sponsored); c) Subclass 189 (Skilled – Independent) (Points-tested Stream); d) Subclass 190 (Skilled – Nominated); e) Subclass 475 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored); f) Subclass 487 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored; g) Subclass 489 (Skilled – Regional (Provisional)); h) Subclass 495 (Skilled – Independent Regional (Provisional); i) Subclass 496 (Skilled –Designated Area-sponsored (Provisional); j) Subclass 497 (Graduate – Skilled); k) Subclass 861 (Skilled – Onshore Independent New Zealand Citizen); l) Subclass 862 (Skilled – Onshore Australian–sponsored New Zealand Citizen); m) Subclass 863 (Skilled – Onshore Designated Area–sponsored New Zealand Citizen); n) Subclass 880 (Skilled –Independent Overseas Student); o) Subclass 881 (Skilled Australian-sponsored Overseas Student); p) Subclass 882 (Skilled – Designated Area-sponsored Overseas Student); q) Subclass 885 (Skilled – Independent); r) Subclass 886 (Skilled –– Sponsored). 11. Schedule B 1. The following visas (being permanent visas under the Employer Nomination Scheme) are specified: a) Subclass 121 (Employer Nomination); b) Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme); and c) Subclass 856 (Employer Nomination Scheme). 2. The following visas (being permanent visas under the Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) are specified: a) Subclass 119 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme); b) Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme); and c) Subclass 857 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme).

Can someone explain this please, i just read it somewhere.

[Andytomas]

8 minutes ago, sydneyishuk said:

Sorry to hear about the refusal  

Maybe the $ spent on training didn't meet the benchmark or could be another reason? 

Did you use an MA?

The Training Benchmark system requires sponsors to demonstrate expenditure of:

• an amount equivalent to 2% of gross payroll towards a training fund, such as a donation to a TAFE college or University; or
• an amount equivalent to 1% of gross payroll on training Australian staff.

Existing sponsors are required to meet the Training Benchmarks either on the anniversary of their sponsorship or in each financial year.

Options;

1. Your employer can appeal the refusal - only would recommend if 100% you believe that immi made mistake - this is a loong process though could be 1/2 years or more to get the appeal.
2. Are you still on 457 visa? is it a possibility to submit a new application? I know its at great expense but likely to be processed quicker than the appeal route. Only thing is Employer will need to pay the SAF.
3. If on a bridging visa already (that is if your 457 has already expired) bit of a trickier process you can re-apply but you will be on bridging visa C - which means no travel!

Speak to some Migration Lawyers/Agents and assess the options best for you - would definitely recommend specialist advise under the circumstances.

Wish you all the best and again so sorry - I understand went through a nomination refusal too 

Yes I have an MA. 

It looks that they didn’t like that my boss provide the training for us. During application on 457 we explained that and the sponsorship was approved. In addition, we sent receipt  as proof of training by other companies. 

Should my MA write an email with all the training documents explaining to recheck it again due to the fact that my company paid the 2%? I don’t want give up 

[sydneyishuk]

 

@Kashif.Iqbal - please provide the link for this information as your pasted information is hurting my eyes 

Edited May 3, 2019 by sydneyishuk

[melal]

1 hour ago, sydneyishuk said:

Hi Melal,

Your application can be processed in any state, even just look at the post above yours someone in WA got granted by NSW processing department.

Thanks

[Royal1]

1 hour ago, sydneyishuk said:

Do you have a Migration Agent? As would always recommend to seek professional migration advice.

Can you elaborate on your Alias at work...  to what extent is it used? Is it on your payslips/official employment documents etc? or just like a Nick Name?

In this case I would get your company to provide a letter to the department (on company letter head) explaining that you are known as "alias" at work - however you are legally known as.... 

Also you could include a statutory declaration - explain truthfully why it was not disclosed - you could also submit the Form 1023 ( https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/form-listing/forms/1023.pdf ) Notification of incorrect answer and try to correct it.

 

It is just a nick name. Not on payslip or any other legal documents.

[Hex]

2 minutes ago, Royal1 said:

It is just a nick name. Not on payslip or any other legal documents.

@Royal1 If it's only a nick name, how did the CO find out about it? Could you help us understand a little more please?

[Kashif.Iqbal]

49 minutes ago, sydneyishuk said:

 

@Kashif.Iqbal - please provide the link for this information as your pasted information is hurting my eyes 

I just copied from one FB page, they haven't mentioned any link. If the link is there i  don't have any personal issue to copy here. 

[art]

10 minutes ago, Hex said:

@Royal1 If it's only a nick name, how did the CO find out about it? Could you help us understand a little more please?

Agreed, you may call yourself whatever you want "in Facebook". As long as you do not use the alias in legal documents it does not have any legal consequences. 

[Hex]

Just now, Kashif.Iqbal said:

I just copied from one FB page, they haven't mentioned any link. If the link is there i  don't have any personal issue to copy here. 

@Kashif.Iqbal It's little tough helping or providing advise on topics that cannot be verified and with no context. 
- Is there anything else on that FB page that could help indicate where this came from? If not, it could simply be a write up from one of the people within that group and non of us would know better. 

[Kashif.Iqbal]

1 minute ago, Hex said:

@Kashif.Iqbal It's little tough helping or providing advise on topics that cannot be verified and with no context. 
- Is there anything else on that FB page that could help indicate where this came from? If not, it could simply be a write up from one of the people within that group and non of us would know better. 

FB page details including post.

As i said no link was mentioned there.