Guest The Pom Queen Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 The Australian government has resisted calls to scrap the so-called 'backpacker tax', which is set to come into force in July 2016. Despite strong opposition from Australian farmers and tourism bodies, the government will press ahead with the scheme, which will see travellers who hold working holiday visas taxed 32.5 cents on every Australian dollar earned. It's understood that the 'backpacker tax', introduced by the federal government, will generate funds amounting to $AUS 540 million over a period of four years. The tax is likely to affect 230,000 travellers, aged 18-30, who come from around the world each year for short-term job stints on an Australian working holiday visa, such as the 462 visa. Farmers lead campaign to scrap 'backpacker tax' on working holidaymakers Australian farmers have been particularly vocal in their opposition to the tax, warning that it will lead to a reduction in the flow of short-term working holiday visa holders who help to harvest fruit and vegetable crops. At present, travellers on a working holiday visa pay tax only if they earn more than $AUS 18,200 a year and are then taxed 19 cents for every dollar earned. The New South Wales (NSW) Farmers' Association, the body which represents farmers in New South Wales, stressed that the new, higher tax level will discourage visitors from coming to work on Australian farms and has left farmers 'very worried.' The industrial relations manager for the NSW Farmers' Association, Ms Gracia Kusuma, said: "Farmers will be deeply affected by this. The backpackers are not taking away these jobs from local workers. The fruit needs to come off the trees, so if there are less seasonal workers available, the cost of production becomes higher and it becomes questionable whether it is sustainable." Singaporeans likely to be affected by working holidaymaker visa changes The plans to raise the tax will also hit Singaporeans, who it is likely will be eligible to come under the 12-month working holiday visa scheme in future. According to a report published last year by Australia's Department of Immigration and Border Protection, Australia has been negotiating terms with Singapore for their nationals to come under the working holidaymaker visa scheme. The Australian 462 visa requires applicants to be aged 18-30, have functional English and meet certain educational requirements. Those granted an Australian working holiday visa can work for 12 months, however, they're only allowed to work six months for a single employer. Visa holders are also permitted to study for up to four months. Citizens from 15 nations can apply for the 462 working holiday visa including those from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and the US. The government's decision to hike taxes during the May budget in 2015 has led to strong criticism from various Australian industry sectors, especially tourism. Travellers say they're already receiving low-pay for jobs in fruit picking and hospitality work and increased taxes would discourage them from coming to Australia if a third of their earnings faced taxation. In an interview with ABC News, Fabian Kraus, a German backpacker in Australia on a 462 working holiday visa, said: "I've picked grapes and lemons during my time in Australia, but the tax would make life difficult for travellers who already have to contend with the country's high cost of living. Thirty-two per cent, I must say, is a very, very high number and I think it will affect the way backpackers come to Australia." Critics urge tax review of Australian working holidaymaker scheme Those opposed to the tax have urged the government to reconsider lowering the rate from 32.5 per cent to 19 per cent. The National Farmers' Federation claimed that travellers on working holiday visas in Australia earn around $AUS 15,000 during their time in the country. However, they contribute approximately $AUS 3.5 billion to the economy each year. Yet, the government remains unfazed by the protests. Treasurer for the federal government, Scott Morrison, said: "Being a working holidaymaker does not mean you get a tax holiday." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blossom Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Many should have been paying the visitor rates anyway as they often don't qualify as a resident for tax purposes but they put themselves down for it anyway. I'm assuming this is to stop that. It will be tough for convincing people to want to work though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travelfar Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 That is interesting. A third of wages on tax? Surely that can't be true. That would likely bring most backpackers into a deficit whilst on a WHV. It would be very very difficult to save money. It would kill the WHV! Is this definitely real? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northshorepom Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 They have lost sight of the purpose of the WHV and convinced themselves Australia is doing backpackers a big favour by allowing them to come here, rather than the mutually beneficial relationship which is the reality. It will inevitably lead to less people coming here on the WHV and therefore less of a pool of seasonal labor available. It's just a question of extent What are the revenue predictions predicated on? They must have assumed some drop in numbers (if they haven't, then the numbers are obviously bogus) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travelfar Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 It is very bad news for people like me that are set to begin their' WHV after this date. The question is if it is still possible to survive with this effective wage cut, maybe it is a deterrant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannysavagelfc Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 im also in the same boat, flying out in august, 32% is a BIG CHUNK!!!!! im a bit worried if im honest, i pressume this wont effect cash in hand jobs but for the likes of farming where ure gunna need the stamp and proof on employment ure gunna have to prove the tax u have paid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
movingback Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) I also think this is a load of boll****. Another money grab plain and simple. They're young, healthy, work jobs most Aussies don't want to do and place minimal burden on our health system etc etc. I think a better way to go would be to NOT require employers to pay superannuation to WHV employees. Whats the point in a pension plan to a 20 year old, in a foreign country? But of course, that would annoy the all important super companies, can't have that can we. Never mind the poor old farmer who has to pay for it! Edited March 10, 2016 by movingback Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JockinTas Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Our local paper has had a lot letters in it recently from local farmers who rely heavily on backpackers at fruit picking time and other forms of farm work. They are worried that this tax will put a lot of backpackers off. Lots of locals are employed but at peak season, there's not enough workers around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannysavagelfc Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Like i said they will just have to pay prople cash in hand, **** for 2nd year visa stamps though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travelfar Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Looks like they might be going back on this idea http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/fed-govt-back-down-on-plan-to-hike-backpacker-tax/news-story/3b82aeed419fe30154ff15d870a0e837 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.