Jump to content

Renting V Buying


Guest The Pom Queen

Recommended Posts

Guest The Pom Queen

“Rent money is dead money” or so the saying goes. It’s a popular myth perpetuated by plenty of people in the real estate industry. But when we did the sums, the reality was quite different.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) recently had similar findings to us: that since 1955, there hasn’t been much difference between renting or buying. Despite the constant news of property booms and million dollar sales in suburbs not known for being expensive, owners and renters over the last 60 years ended up in roughly the same place. That of course relied on renters being equally disciplined about saving, and investing those savings outside of cash deposits.

Like any financial decision, there are costs and benefits associated with buying and renting. We discuss some of the important pros and cons to consider when deciding whether to rent or buy, and work out which is likely to give the best results.

Buying

 

Pros of buying

 

1) The appreciation (rise) in house prices over time. It’s hard to miss the stories that house prices have been rising, and fast over the past couple of years. The average Sydney property has risen 26% since the start of 2013 and other major cities haven’t been far behind. That’s great news for those that own. But while house prices have consistently risen over the long-term, they can also have periods of weak growth or even fall in value. During the financial crisis, house prices in the US fell by an average of 33.8%.

buy-vs-rent-us-prices.png

House owners also need to understand and be prepared to cope during periods of house price weakness.

2) Buying gives you the benefit of leverage. When you borrow money to buy a property, the bank lends a percentage of the purchase price to you. In Australia, banks often lend a high percentage of the total value which means the use of borrowed money to invest in the property, or the leverage, can be quite high.

For instance, it’s typical to contribute a 20% deposit and the bank mortgage covers the remaining 80%, or an 80% Loan to Value Ratio (LVR). Let’s say you buy a property for $500,000 with a deposit of $100,000 and borrow the remaining $400,000. If you sell the property a year later for $550,000, the property itself has risen 10% in value but your return on investment is 50% since you have made $50,000 profit on a $100,000 investment (i.e. the original deposit). That’s 5x leverage because you earned a 5x 10% return. It should be noted that after transaction costs, interest and principal repayments, the actual return is likely to be lower. Also, the opposite would be true if the house price fell from $500,000 to $450,000. Your profit would be -50% or worse after repayments and costs are accounted for.

3) Buying also provides some intangible benefits, like the security of not being displaced when the landlord decides to kick you out, and the flexibility to renovate the property.

Cons of buying

 

1) Interest repayments. If rent money is dead money then interest repayments are dead money too. Average variable interest rates are currently about 4.50% which means that you would pay about $18,000 a year on a $400,000 loan to buy a $500,000 house. That’s almost the same amount as the $19,500 you would pay to rent a similar value property for a year.

With interest rates at all time lows there’s a good chance that the rates in 5 or 10 years time will be much higher than now which means mortgage repayments could increase in the future. The RBA estimates that long term variable mortgage rates have been about 6.20% over the long term.

2) Opportunity cost. This is a cost that is often ignored or at least not understood very well. It refers to the cost of having your money tied up in a property versus having it available to use elsewhere. In simple terms, opportunity cost refers to the returns you could get elsewhere instead of putting down a house deposit. That could be returns from cash deposits (currently about 4%), a diversified portfolio (historically 8%), or investing in your own business.

3) Ownership costs. The transaction costs of buying and selling a property are high. The RBA estimates that the costs of buying a house including stamp duty and other buying costs including conveyancing can be 4.3% on average. The cost of selling a house including real estate agent commissions and advertising costs add up to about 3.0%. Therefore the total costs of buying and selling a house are in the vicinity of 7.3%. And this ignores the ongoing running costs of owning a property which the RBA estimates to be at least 2.6% per year including council rates, repairs, depreciation, body corporate fees, water and insurance costs.

Renting

 

buy-vs-rent-sign.jpg

Pros of renting

 

1) Return on your savings. Renting frees up your savings to earn a return elsewhere and depending on where those savings are invested, they may be able to earn a higher return than would be possible in property. This is the flip side of the opportunity cost of buying. Returns available in term deposits and savings accounts have been falling recently as the RBA has cut interest rates. This has made other investments like shares and bonds more attractive since bank deposit rates are now under 4% compared to a diversified portfolio of shares and bonds which has historically returned closer to 8% over the long-term.

2) Flexibility. While owning a property provides more stability, renting gives more flexibility. This may be attractive especially for young singles and families who may need to move from place to place due to work, due to bad neighbours or to try out different neighbourhoods.

3) Diversification. When you buy your own home, most (if not all) of your eggs are in one basket. One property in one suburb in one city in one country. That’s alot of your total wealth riding on a single investment that can be impacted by a whole list of factors outside your control. Renting allows you to spread that risk across a much broader range of investments. For example, our Stockspot portfolios contain over 1,400 stocks and bonds from around the world including an allocation to Australian property stocks. So you get the benefit of some property exposure while also spreading your risk across many more investments.

Cons of renting

 

1) Rental costs. Renting costs have been steadily increasing in Australia. A typical rental yield (annual rent costs / house value) in Australia is now 3.9% but ranges from 2.5% to 5.0% depending on factors such as location, property value and whether it’s an apartment or house. Rent is the equivalent to interest you pay on a mortgage. It’s the cost of borrowing an asset – in the case of renting, the asset is a property whereas for a mortgage you’re borrowing money. Over the long-term, average rental yields have been 4.2% compared to an average variable mortgage rate of 6.2%. The current lower mortgage rates of around 4.5% have encouraged many to look at buying, however buyers should be factoring in higher average rates for a 30 year mortgage.

2) No forced savings. Unlike buying where you are forced to contribute to a mortgage each month (which includes interest and principal repayments), renting doesn’t encourage forced savings. This can make it tempting for renters to spend spare cash rather than setting it aside. However, technology has enabled services like Pocketbook and Stockspot to make it easy for consumers to budget, save and invest – so keeping up with homeowners is becoming easier for renters in Australia.

Buy vs Rent – the results

 

We have looked at whether someone would be better off buying, or renting and investing their savings in a diversified portfolio over the next 7 years. The results show the difference in overall financial position based on different possible return rates for property and investing.

A positive number shows where renting is better than buying and the percentage amount reflects the difference in returns over 7 years. Renting beats buying in 16 of the 25 scenarios and by 8.4% in our ‘base case’ of 5.5% property growth and 7.5% investment portfolio growth.

buy-vs-rent-comparison.png

We have used a number of assumptions and different assumptions would impact these results. It should be noted that we have not considered the impact of ‘negative gearing’ which is a tax benefit that may be available if the property is held as an investment. Equally, franking credits on the share part of the portfolio have not been included in the investment returns. We also haven’t put a dollar value on the emotional benefits of owning or renting like security (owning) or flexibility (renting).

The case for buying

 

Over the last 3 years buying in major cities like Sydney and Melbourne has been a profitable strategy. Sydney prices have increased about 30% since January 2012 so combined with 5x leverage (80% LVR), investors in property would have enjoyed a return of nearly 150% on their initial investment.

What are the risks? Buying with leverage magnifies both the good and bad. So if you buy a Sydney property today with a 20% deposit (80% LVR), the property value would only need to fall 20% in value (i.e. where prices were less than 2 years ago) to completely wipe out the value of your initial investment. This happened to many property owners in the US between 2007-2010 when property prices fell by 33.8% between April 2006 and December 2011.

US homeowners that ended up with zero or negative equity after the property collapse and couldn’t keep up with interest repayments simply ‘handed back’ their house keys to their mortgage lender and their houses were sold to cover the loan. Where the funds recouped from sale were insufficient to cover the outstanding loan, the banks couldn’t go after the borrower for the subsequent loss because US loans are “non-recourse”. In Australia however, mortgage loans are “recourse loans” which means that the banks can chase you for any loss they incur when foreclosing your loan. This puts Australian borrowers at more personal risk in the situation of a property bust.

Australia was lucky to avoid a house price collapse during the financial crisis but that’s not to say it can’t happen here. Many academics and economists have been warning of the possibility of something similar in Australia. But provided it doesn’t happen and prices continue to increase, leverage will benefit those who own. Over the long term, the value of leverage is roughly equal to (annual return – mortgage interest rate) x leverage.

Example

If a property returns 7%, interest repayments are 5% and leverage is 5x (500k property / 100k deposit) then your return is about 10%. That’s a solid return but relies on property continuing to rise more than mortgage interest rates. This will become more difficult as interest rates eventually rise from their 50-year lows.

The case for renting

 

Renting frees up your savings to invest elsewhere; either in term deposits, your business or a diversified investment portfolio. While rental yields are low (just 3.9% in Sydney compared to a long term average of 4.2%), it’s an attractive time to be renting and investing your savings somewhere else that could earn a higher return. This is why rent money isn’t really dead money – provided that savings are invested rather than spent.

Renting also enables you to avoid two big risks:

1) the risk of leverage which could mean your savings are overextended if property prices fall, and

2) the risk of poor diversification. When you buy, all of your eggs are in one basket so your wealth is almost completely reliant on the success of one asset. Renting allows you to spread those risks much more widely.

Our conclusion

 

Our analysis agrees with the RBA that renters are likely to be better off than property owners over the next 7 years based on long-term assumptions. This is consistent with the RBA’s assessment that Australian property is 19% overvalued compared to renting.

Prospective property buyers should think twice before jumping at the opportunity to sink their savings into a house. Leverage and poor diversification make home ownership much riskier than many people expect. The big benefit of a property mortgage has historically been the forced savings it encourages. With technology enabled services like ours, it’s now easier and more affordable to save without a mortgage. Renters today have more options than in the past to stay ahead

 

Read more.http://blog.stockspot.com.au/rent-or-buy-we-do-the-sums/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=buy-vs-rent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest The Pom Queen

TBH I would never rent again, we moved to Townsville for health reasons have been in our rental 3 months and have now been issued with a notice that they are selling. It's ok if you are young, fit and healthy but for older people it is a nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how it can be better.

 

I now own my home worth over $1M. If I rented I wouldn't own anything.

 

 

Well good for you. But could you afford to buy your own house now if you were starting out? To buy a $1m house you need a 6 figure deposit and at least $250,000 household income. Not possible for the vast majority of Australians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renting for a little while is ok, whilst I rented I chose not to look at it as dead money but just one of my living costs like food and utilities. And I suppose it was nice not to have to worry about maintenance matters.

 

Longer term though, no not for me, I like the security of being in my own place, can do what I want to it and never need worry about being thrown out. Can't put a price on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest The Pom Queen
I don't see how it can be better.

 

I now own my home worth over $1M. If I rented I wouldn't own anything.

I'm guessing you mean you own it outright which I suppose is different to having a mortgage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well good for you. But could you afford to buy your own house now if you were starting out? To buy a $1m house you need a 6 figure deposit and at least $250,000 household income. Not possible for the vast majority of Australians.

 

It is harder now than at one time of course, I agree with that. But are you sure that it is not possible for the vast majority of Australians? I thought there were plenty of Australian home owners and first time buyers around. When you are young, you don't go for the $1million dollar house, you start with a studio or one bed apartment, then many will become a couple and can upgrade, earnings probably increase and hopefully some profit on the first purchase. The dream house takes many years to obtain, always has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its all relative.

I bought it 20 years ago for $225000 and had a big mortgage for the time.

 

But eventually you pay it off.

Some things along the way like redundancy payout and an inheritance helped pay it off.

But get in the market and own your own home by the time you retire should be everyone's goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We owned in the UK, remortgaging to move, house price crashing meant we auctioned and walked away with what we owed, so here we rented, for 4 yrs we rented. We now own again as we inherited a small amount of money but was enough for 5% deposit.

I find we are way worse of owning, costs are much higher, maintenance, rates, water, loss of rent assist etc.. however unless circumstances meant we had no choice, I would much prefer too own.

However we now have a large mortgage of 25 + yrs and hubbys is over mid 40's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interest on a million dollar mortgage would be about 45k annually. Could rent a pretty good house for that and put money into savingswhilst not paying rates and water and maintenance costs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big thing the article doesn't cover in a lot of detail is the biggest thing that caused us to buy. Retirement.

 

If you are renting come age 65, or haven't bought in time to pay off the mortgage, then you need to be in one of three scenarios.

1. Have enough funds to support you - something a LOT of us wont and particularly migrants as we don't start paying into super until later in life

2. You are going to have to sell if you have a mortgage and downsize - possibly dramatically

3. If you are renting, you need to think how you will now continue to pay the rent on a much reduced income

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is harder now than at one time of course, I agree with that. But are you sure that it is not possible for the vast majority of Australians? I thought there were plenty of Australian home owners and first time buyers around. When you are young, you don't go for the $1million dollar house, you start with a studio or one bed apartment, then many will become a couple and can upgrade, earnings probably increase and hopefully some profit on the first purchase. The dream house takes many years to obtain, always has.

 

Housing affordability is apparently at an all time low, many average Australians are indeed unable to afford to buy so renting is the only option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We rent, but it's only temporary, so we'll grin and bare it for now as there will be an end to it. We could have bought initially but paying $18000 in stamp duty made us decide not to as we won't be here long enough to make it worthwhile. Renting is convenient in some situations but it must be regarded as a stop gap only in Australia.

Edited by scuffythetugboat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had never rented until I came to Oz. I found it fine, we had professionally agents and a great landlord.

 

was kinda nice, not having to deal with maintenance issues.

 

Our choice was buy our own home, further away from the city, or stay renting. Swings and roundabouts. Perth rents really cheap at the mo, you can afford rent in the best areas.

 

We went for buy....in just over a year, our property is worth $20,000 less than we paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our mortgage payments were less than our rental payments so a no brainer. Just because someone will lend you it, doesn't mean you should borrow it. I learnt that lesson back in the UK in the start of the 90's, won't make that mistake again. Many of the OH's work colleagues have properties well over the million mark. We could borrow well over a million if we wanted to but instead we'll keep our small ( by Aussie standards ) property in an outer superb and if plans go right be mortgage free in a few years. That's if I can keep my OH away from his vintage motorbike obsession :laugh:

Edited by Que Sera, Sera
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Housing affordability is apparently at an all time low, many average Australians are indeed unable to afford to buy so renting is the only option.

 

I am very well aware of housing costs in Australia, in fact we left largely due to the costs in Sydney. I was however challenging the comment that the "vast majority of Australians" cannot buy houses. Because I believe that Australia is a nation of home owners and they continue to fly off the shelves.

 

Also if you look at the context, that comment was made in connection with someone saying their house was worth a million. And I think that young buyers should not be expecting to buy the million dollar house after college, you start small and progress with time, dream house might not be here until middle age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...