Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 No prizes for guessing who voted YES in this poll, eh @parleycross? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 No I haven't. Would you like me too ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 So I'm not the only one.. That rather puts a spanner in the works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Okay done. Carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 So I'm not the only one.. That rather puts a spanner in the works. Well done mate. 13.33% impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 I wonder who the other intelligent person is ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisawright Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 We are told if there are major incidents such as deaths, just not the routine operations of protecting our borders. Are you sure? The only statement I've seen is that ALL matters relating to on-water activities are secret. I haven't seen any statement that says ... "unless someone drowns" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallyman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 A question , just read the transcript, if nobody knows what boats are arriving how can the journalist say that the boat is leaking oil and sinking ? Are the people on the boat in communication with journalists in Oz ,if they are true refugees how have they got a mobile phone to communicate with as I would have thought that all they had was very basic clothes and a few personal belongings. no easy answers to this problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 A question , just read the transcript, if nobody knows what boats are arriving how can the journalist say that the boat is leaking oil and sinking ? Are the people on the boat in communication with journalists in Oz ,if they are true refugees how have they got a mobile phone to communicate with as I would have thought that all they had was very basic clothes and a few personal belongings. no easy answers to this problem. Is that the definition of a refugee? Someone with 'very basic clothes and a few personal belongings'? How does the possession of a mobile phone diminish a person's claim to asylum? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy1 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Only a year ago, the thought of offshore detention of innocent men, women and children was appalling to me. Now that seems pretty humane, compared to deciding the fate of desperate people by asking them FOUR QUESTIONS on a customs ship at sea, before handing them to the navy of the country they fled in the first place. Maybe I'm just becoming....a Strayan? 'Art Therapy without Borders' recently posted this link.Whilst I dislike that it is in the Daily Mail, the drawings speak for themselves. Children never have and never will belong in detention. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2677322/Children-caged-Australias-asylum-seeker-policy-pen-anguish-held-detention.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docboat Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Human rights ... just across the water from Sri Lanka is a state FULL of tamils - it is called Tamil Nadu (sp? can't be bothered to fact check), is a state in India, and is a very short boat journey from the tamil areas of SL. So .... they have to board a boat, cross half the world to a place where there are very few tamils, and they explain this by saying they are seeking a place of safety ... complete nonsense. They are seeking a better economic environment. Nothing wrong with that at all, but do it legally please, like almost everyone on this forum. And do not lie about the motives. If it was safety they wanted, a few hours by boat, across the narrow strait, and there they are - in a tamil state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 Human rights ... just across the water from Sri Lanka is a state FULL of tamils - it is called Tamil Nadu (sp? can't be bothered to fact check), is a state in India, and is a very short boat journey from the tamil areas of SL. So .... they have to board a boat, cross half the world to a place where there are very few tamils, and they explain this by saying they are seeking a place of safety ... complete nonsense. They are seeking a better economic environment. Nothing wrong with that at all, but do it legally please, like almost everyone on this forum. And do not lie about the motives. If it was safety they wanted, a few hours by boat, across the narrow strait, and there they are - in a tamil state. You do know that most of the 203 Sri Lankan Tamil asylum seekers came from a refugee camp in India, don't you? You do know that India isn't signatory to the refugee convention, don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docboat Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 And the problem with that is? Tamil state, for tamils right next door. If they want to create a fuss to get their rights, so it in their own state with their own people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy1 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 You do know that most of the 203 Sri Lankan Tamil asylum seekers came from a refugee camp in India, don't you? You do know that India isn't signatory to the refugee convention, don't you? I do, but he clearly does not have a clue!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy1 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 (edited) And the problem with that is? Tamil state, for tamils right next door. If they want to create a fuss to get their rights, so it in their own state with their own people. Living in camps? They are considered oppressive and not safe. Over 100,000 live in just 100 camps, they have no right of movement and no freedom. Your 'they' mentality is really unsettling. Edited July 6, 2014 by Sammy1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 And the problem with that is? Tamil state, for tamils right next door. If they want to create a fuss to get their rights, so it in their own state with their own people. Is that honestly your answer? Is that the best you can come up with? Quick, get on the blower to Morrison...he needs you for his PR campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silencio Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Besides what Australian government did to Tamil asylum seekers I was wondering that nobody blames India what they do to refugees from Sri Lanka! Why doesn't India tries to integrate Tamil refugees in its society? Tamil Nadu has the same language and culture. I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambethlad Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 I am disgusted by Tony Abbott and the Liberal government. This statement appeared on Facebook today - "Tony Abbott is a misogynist, sexist, homophobic, bully, racist, a liar and is the worst PM in Australian history." Can't argue with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parley Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Well if you saw it on Facebook, it must be true then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 Well if you saw it on Facebook, it must be true then. sounds pretty accurate to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallyman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Is that the definition of a refugee? Someone with 'very basic clothes and a few personal belongings'? How does the possession of a mobile phone diminish a person's claim to asylum? - The point I was making is based on TV footage over many years of what the media put on our screens as refugees leaving countries , I was asking a legitimate question on how they are communicating when nobody is supposed to know what's going on , they no doubt have passed through more than one country to get on a boat to come to Australia ,so are they legitimate refugees or economic ones , what would your answer be to the problem Should India be more supportive and accept them and look after them ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 News just in http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/07/australia-asylum-seekers-sri-lanka-sea-transfer [h=1]Australia returns asylum seekers to Sri Lanka in sea transfer[/h] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 News just in http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/07/australia-asylum-seekers-sri-lanka-sea-transfer Australia returns asylum seekers to Sri Lanka in sea transfer All 41 were assigned non refugee status after being asked 4 questions, so called 'enhanced screening'. Funny how it only takes 4 questions on a ship out at sea, and yet it takes apparently months or years in a 3rd world offshore detention centre. This govt stinks to high heaven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallyman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Maybe the governments of the countries these people are leaving stink a bit more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpodom Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 Maybe the governments of the countries these people are leaving stink a bit more You obviously have pretty low expectations of a first world democracy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.