Shane2019
-
Posts
8 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Shane2019's Achievements
Newbie (1/6)
1
Reputation
-
Thought you were talking about 870. My bad.
-
I'm confused here. Do they need an AOS in addition to the sponsorship for 870? Or it's only the AOS team taking charge in 870 sponsorship applications?
-
I have a question. If applicants apply for 143 at the moment, let's say 2019, and then change to 864 at a later time, say 2024, when they become eligible, do they need to queue again as 2024 new applicants?
-
If you rented out your home in UK and lived with your children in Australia, your place of abode would be "more likely than less likely" to be Australia. Since you would be likely to stay in Australia more than 183 days in a financial year and you couldn't establish either your place of abode is elsewhere or you have no intention to take up residency in Australia, the latter of which is downright hard to prove, I would suggest 870 holders are technically tax residents. Another point is when there's ambiguity, ATO tends to interpret in their favour so they can collect more. But this is only my opinion, you should certainly ask for professional advice.
-
OMG I thought it would take about 5 years at the current processing rate
-
If an applicant who as lodged 143 gets onshore on 870, does the DHA pause processing the 143 application immediately or hold the decision until the applicant leaves?
-
On the following page it is stated it doesn't matter if the applicant has lodged 143. https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/sponsored-parent-temporary-870#Eligibility But here under the document section https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/sponsored-parent-temporary-870#HowTo , the applicant must show they are a genuine temporary entrant. On the page for 143, it shows it can only be granted offshore except for certain conditions, excluding 870. I wonder if this indicates something or is just not updated yet. Sadly the clarification didn't clarify much.
-
Hi Alan, Thanks for posting this explanatory note on the forum. But it seems they still left many parts unexplained. Could applicants for this visa get bridging visas if they are on 600 visitor visas?
