Go Back   PomsInOz Forum > Forum > Lounge Room > Migration Issues

Notices

Migration Issues Discuss all aspects about migrating to Australia and the visa process


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2007, 10:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Gollywobbler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 6,135
Thanks: 49
Thanked 193 Times in 145 Posts
My Mood:
Gollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud of
New Citizenship Act Query

Hi All

When the Citizenship Bill was wending its way through Parliament in Oz, someone asked JAJ whether it would be enough if they simply validated their PR visa before 1 July 2007, or whether they would have to have started to live in Australia before then?

JAJ said that it depends on how one interprets the new legislation.

Well, I am trained to read legislation, so I downloaded the Bill but I got completely bogged down. I can't remember the details now but I think it was something to do with the fact that the new Act doesn't define Permanent Resident. It refers one to the Migration Act as far as I can recall but that doesn't really define the term either as far as I could see.

I admit to being too lazy to have tried to get to the bottom of it properly. Nobody pays me to wade through reams of turgid Ozzy legal prose, after all! I'd hate to do Migration Agency for a living - the legislation is too weighty and too boring! Plus they change it every 5 minutes. The Regs should be in the Guiness Book or Records as the most tweaked-about piece of legislation on the planet.

I'm wondering what the Agents on here think the answer to this question is, please? Or it is known as fact that it will be OK simply to have validated a PR visa by 1st July? With the sudden rush of visa-grants that seem to be happening, I reckon that this question must be becoming hugely significant for huge numbers of people.

Thanks all

Gill

Gollywobbler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsors
Old 02-05-2007, 10:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
ali
Moderator
 
ali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Leeming, WA
Posts: 7,660
Thanks: 63
Thanked 191 Times in 137 Posts
My Mood:
ali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud of
Great post Gill - I'm sure alot of people will be glued for the answer
__________________
I am too positive to be doubtful, too optimistic to be fearful and too determined to be defeated!
ali is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 12:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
Teenagers in Oz
 
samozsoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kirkham NSW
Posts: 905
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
samozsoon is on a distinguished road
Hi Gill

I for one am waiting with bated breath.

I found out the other week that the kids wont be able to get student loans unless citizens.
With the eldest hoping to study veterinary science in Jan09 and this being a 5 yr course, it is very important for us (or him) to get citizenship asap.

We are planning to validate before end of June but dont think we can stay til July 1st as kids have commitments here that they dont want to miss, (school prom, dance production, work exp, training courses).

So would anyone know if validating is enough or do we need to actually be present in Oz on July 1st ??

Please help, Sam xx
samozsoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 12:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ptlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 215
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
ptlabs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by samozsoon View Post
I for one am waiting with bated breath.
Is anyone interested in reading my reasons for considering this question as potentially irrelevant in the grand scheme of things?

Make no mistake, I spend a lot of time and energy answering the same query from my clients. My answer tends to bring them back to reality, but it may not be the answer everything is holding their breath for.


Peter
__________________
Ptlabs Consulting | Registered Migration Agent 0427067 | Specialist in ACS/RPL/IT cases
http://ptlabs.com.au/
ptlabs is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ptlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 215
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
ptlabs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlabs View Post
but it may not be the answer everything is holding their breath for.
I meant "everyone" :)

Can't edit posts here unfortunately... Then again, I should be grateful I'm allowed to post at all...

Peter
__________________
Ptlabs Consulting | Registered Migration Agent 0427067 | Specialist in ACS/RPL/IT cases
http://ptlabs.com.au/
ptlabs is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 02:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Gollywobbler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 6,135
Thanks: 49
Thanked 193 Times in 145 Posts
My Mood:
Gollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud ofGollywobbler has much to be proud of
Hi Peter

I went to bed earlier but I'm now wide awake again. Thank you for your answer but I confess I am baffled by it.

This question is relevant to loads of people. That is why I have asked it. Samozsoon has told us what her own reason is: Her child needs to be a Citizen before he can qualify for a student loan for a 5-7 year Vet course. It takes longer to train as a vet than it does to train as a doctor or a lawyer because of the need to learn about ruminants, reptiles and rats, so her son's need for a student loan will clearly be great.

(The only bit of Biology that I ever learned myself was a comment by Straddles, the Biology Master at St Trinians when I was 16. He came out with the information that the rat (rattus rattus rattus officially) is the only mammal to have a bone in its penis. That must be intriguing for Mrs Rat.... Natch, it caused a crowd of 16 year old girls to fall about in hysterics shrieking in mirth, "How do you get by then, Straddles? Do you rely on a splint?" Poor old Straddles, but he did ask for that one..... Pass this info on to your son, Sam. Such an obscure piece of information ought to get him a scholarship, I reckon!

Biology 'O' Level was a disaster for me - a diagram of a kidney-shaped item with what looked like a pair of roots sticking out of it. The roots ruled out the possibility of a kidney bowl so, being a logical child and working through the alphabet, I wrote an inflated version of what I knew - exactly nothing - about the Life and Times of the Kidney Bean. I don't like them - hate the texture of them in chilli con carne. My essay deserved the Booker Prize for fiction, though, I can tell you. According to Straddles afterwards it was a diagram of a mammalian kidney and I should have yapped about some dreadful experiment he had made us do, involving taking a tiny sliver of what he said was a kidney and dropping it into a test tube containing a clear liquid. Which then fizzed mightily and the said sliver vanished. This was a demonstration of "Enzyme Action" said Straddles. I concluded that it would be safer to leave the Private Life of an Enzyme firmly alone. Enzymes are clearly not nice to their enemies.)

However, I digress...

Why do you think my question is irrelevant, please?

Cheers


Gill
Gollywobbler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 03:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ptlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 215
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
ptlabs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollywobbler View Post
Why do you think my question is irrelevant, please?
Gill,

This topic is followed with intense interest by all aspiring as well as current permanent residents, and not surprisingly so.

I've drawn up a diagram illustrating the legislative arrangements relevant to this question. I am in the process of putting this up to my website, so I ask for everyone's patience while I do the needful.

The law is explicit in this: if you are in Australia on Commencement Day of the new Act, and you hold a permanent visa in any shape and form, you will need to meet the 2 of 5 rule if you apply for citizenship within 3 years of Commencement. There's no choice in this, you will not be eligible to apply under the new Act, even if you would qualify for citizenship under the new Act faster than under the old Act.

If you are outside of Australia on Commencement Day, you need to be classified as a permanent resident under the old Act. This is where I need to stop typing and let my diagram to the work, as it is quite a maze referring to all the various Acts and Regulations. Ultimately, the law explicitly spells out who is a permanent resident for this purpose. Only a holder of a Resident Return Visa is considered to be a permanent resident while outside of Australia.

DIAC's letters granting permanent visas carry a paragraph advising recipients of the imminent changes in Australian citizenship rules. DIAC simplifies what is defines as a permanent resident in that paragraph and does not address the issue of what happens to people who have been granted a permanent visa which has been duly validated and aren't in Australia on Commencement Day.

As Departmental Policy cannot override laws enacted by Parliament, it doesn't matter if DIAC thinks you're a permanent resident or not - ultimately you need to look at what the Act and Regulations say, and if need be what the High Court decides. My opinion on this is not explicit but can be inferred by my diagram.

The new Act exempts permanent residents from the new 4-year requirement. This is allowed only if you apply within 3 years of Commencement. So, really, if you've been granted a permanent visa, and have no intention of migrating to Australia within 1 year of Commencement, it's irrelevant whether or not a validated permanent visa is enough for the 2/5 rule. One year is not a very long time to make up your mind about migration.

Given the intense interest in this topic, I may just put my diagram up on ebay or something. For what it's worth, my diagram isn't actually written in plain English :)

And for the record, this is the longest and most detailed explanation from me on this topic. I didn't fully enter the exhaustive discussions in BritishExpats as it would have been difficult to focus everyone on the issues I have to point out. So Gill, this one's only because you asked personally :)


Peter
__________________
Ptlabs Consulting | Registered Migration Agent 0427067 | Specialist in ACS/RPL/IT cases
http://ptlabs.com.au/
ptlabs is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
ali
Moderator
 
ali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Leeming, WA
Posts: 7,660
Thanks: 63
Thanked 191 Times in 137 Posts
My Mood:
ali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud ofali has much to be proud of
I got lost a little with the explanation - sorry - in my defence I've been up since 5.30am. I'll look at the diagram when it's finished I think

Ali
__________________
I am too positive to be doubtful, too optimistic to be fearful and too determined to be defeated!
ali is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Welshtone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 346
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Welshtone is on a distinguished road
Hi Ali

I have a bit of pre-prepared blurb for my clients which attempts to simplify things. A lot of the definition of permanent resident does not apply to people looking to Validate their migrant visas:

I’ll try and keep this as simple as possible –

Those people who were permanent residents of Australia (as defined by the old citizenship Act) when the new legislation comes into effect (midnight 30th June 07) need to meet the old residence requirements, but must apply for Citizenship before 01 July 2010.

. So you have to at least validate before 01 July.

Permanent Resident is defined clearly under Section 5 of the amended Citizenship Act. It states, inter alia, that a person is a permanent resident at a particular time if both the following circumstances apply:

1 the person is not present in Australia at that time and holds a permanent visa at that time;and
2 the person has previously been present in Australia and held a Permanent Visa immediately before last leaving Australia.

So the new definition definitely covers the validating migrant who then leaves Australia before the new legislation commences on 01 July 07.

But you have to be considered a permanent resident under the old Act which is much more complicated. The relevant bit is similar to the new definition except it is more specific in relation to the type of permanent visa you must hold.

Of the currently issued types of visas, it does not reference Migrant visas but only Resident Return Visas (RRV).

When you validate a migrant visa, it then acts like a RRV but it is never actually an RRV.

So the legal situation is that under the old Act, somebody who validates a migrant visa, and then leaves, would not strictly be a permanent resident while outside Australia, under the old (curreent) act.

HOWEVER, Immigration has always treated migrant visa holders as effectively holding an RRV, so we have a case where the Department has a policy that does not mirror the actual law – this has now been put right under the new definition.

I am sure that Immigration will continue to be flexible with it’s old definition of permanent resident but as the law does not back it up, it is hard to advise people that they will definitely be OK. My best advice is that I think you will be 99% sure of staying under the old requirements if you validate and then leave before 01 July, and 100% sure if you validate and be present in Australia on 30th June/01st July. So, if you possibly can validate and remain while the new act comes into effect, then do, otherwise there is a risk that you may not be able to come under the old requirements. Those that wish to avail of the old requirements will have to apply for citizenship before 01 July 2010, so if you validate and leave, total absences after 01 July 07 must be less than a year on aggregate.

Some will benefit from the new residency requirements so if you are near the 2nd stage of the spouse (801 or 100 or 826) it may be better to delay your permanent visa until after 01 July as you only need 1 year of permanent residency under the new requirements – up to 3 years legal temporary residence can be counted towards the 4 years. ENS/RSMS applicants who have been in Australia for 2 years or more could also benefit by delaying their permanent visa until after 30th June.

Regards



Tony Coates
MARN 0635896
Welshtone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
Teenagers in Oz
 
samozsoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kirkham NSW
Posts: 905
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
samozsoon is on a distinguished road
Oh God Am really confused now.

Thanks though Peter & Tony.
Why wont the Oz Gov clarify it? Or do they think it already clear enough?

Anyway, does anyone know if we can get a student loan from the UK to study in Oz?
Clutching at straws now....

Sam xx


samozsoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsors
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Citizenship Rules samozsoon Migration Issues 2 17-04-2007 01:45 PM
University Query and Diabetes Query The Spoonies Education 5 17-04-2007 09:39 AM
Citizenship ali Migration Issues 7 11-03-2007 02:23 PM
Another Citizenship Query - Sorry Gollywobbler Migration Issues 14 17-10-2006 06:49 AM
Citizenship Question Gollywobbler Migration Issues 3 26-09-2006 09:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 AM.