6Likes
-
1
Post By snifter
-
2
Post By Alaska
-
1
Post By Petals
-
1
Post By Wiganlad
-
1
Post By supa
-
GCSE exam overhaul in England from 2014 - a real possibility
BBC reported this (as did other news sources)
Tough new O-Levels to replace GCSEs under Gove plan
By Angela HarrisonEducation correspondent, BBC News
Education Secretary Michael Gove plans to scrap GCSEs for England and return to O-level style exams.
Sources have told the BBC that Mr Gove believes GCSEs "have gone beyond the point of rescue". The changes, planned to be brought in for pupils from autumn 2014, would amount to the biggest change to the exams system for a generation. Less academic pupils would sit a different "more straightforward" exam, like the old CSE.
Labour says Mr Gove must explain his changes to teachers and pupils. GCSEs replaced O-levels and CSEs in the mid-1980s. Now a similar system could return, although sources say the names of the new exams are yet to be decided. The details are in a leaked document seen by the Daily Mail which sources say are broadly correct.
As control of education in the UK is devolved, Mr Gove's plans are for England only. It will be up to Wales and Northern Ireland to decide whether to follow suit. In Scotland, pupils take Standard Grades and Highers rather than GCSEs and A-levels.
National curriculum - The plan is for students to begin studying for new tougher O-level style exams in English, maths and the sciences from September 2014. They would take their exams in 2016. So, pupils starting their GCSE courses in September 2013 could be the last to take them.
The leaked document also shows plans for the national curriculum at secondary level to be scrapped altogether, so that heads would decide what pupils should study. Already, the new academy schools, which are state-funded but semi-independent, do not have to follow the national curriculum. The document also says the government plans to scrap the traditional benchmark on which secondary schools in England are measured - the requirement for pupils to get five good GCSEs (grades A* to C) including maths and English.
Schools would continue to be measured on the government's new benchmark - the English Baccalaureate - which counts how many pupils in a school have good GCSEs in English, maths, two sciences, geography, history and a foreign language.
Exam boards - Another change suggested is that one exam board would be chosen to set the O-level style papers for English, maths and science - with all pupils taking the same exam. Currently, six exam boards design GCSEs and schools choose which board to use.
Mr Gove has previously said he believes this system has led to a "race to the bottom", where exam boards could be tempted to "dumb down" exam content so pupils scored higher marks. That has always been roundly rejected by the exam boards and by the previous Labour government.
According to the leaked document, the plan is to put the new proposals out for consultation in the autumn, so it is not definite they will happen. The government had already announced that it wanted to shake up GCSEs by returning to the system where most exams were taken after two years rather than in modules and those changes were already planned to affect pupils beginning their GCSE studies this autumn.
Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said Mr Gove had to explain whether the change would really improve standards.
"When the Tories abolished O-levels and introduced GCSEs in the 1980s they said standards would rise. Now they say they've fallen," he said.
"If there is to be a major overhaul parents will want reassurance that the new system will enable all children to progress and reach their full potential."
As the news broke late on Wednesday there has been little reaction so far but some critics are saying the government plans to return to an "elitist system".
The Department for Education would not confirm the plans. A spokesman said: "We do not comment on leaked documents."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-18529471
-
-
Personally, if this does happen, I for one would be more than happy to see the back of the GCSE. I don't think it has really worked as it was intended.
-
I think something needs to happen. Year on year GCSE results seemed to be rising, but I worked in 16+ education for over 10 years before coming here and the standards I saw were actually dropping. The amount of students who didn't know the basics of Maths, English grammar etc rose a lot in that time.
It's become so "results" based now that the actual ability of the student doesn't seem to matter as long as it looks good on paper for the school/college and the Government.
Some of the things happening in our college were appalling; e.g. not letting students sit English and maths exams to allow them on to the next level of their course in case they failed and the college looked bad. I'd like to see an overhaul of that system too.
-
I agree that standards have dropped. A friend of mine uni lecturer said the same is happening there with the fee paying students from o/seas, does not look good if they fail.
Snap Victoria is supposed to have a shake up.
In my view Aus and Uk need to go back to having diffferent schools. When we had the tech colleges here a lot of children elected to go to them. Streaming was not a bad thing, why does everyone have to be a brain stormer.
Petals

-

Originally Posted by
Alaska
Some of the things happening in our college were appalling; e.g. not letting students sit English and maths exams to allow them on to the next level of their course in case they failed and the college looked bad. I'd like to see an overhaul of that system too.
This seems to be something that happens elsewhere. I've heard that sort of thing about a number of senior schools and 6th forms. Keeps their results looking good and the reports and praise flow in.
-

Originally Posted by
Alaska
It's become so "results" based now that the actual ability of the student doesn't seem to matter as long as it looks good on paper for the school/college and the Government.
Can we have a 'Love' function to supersede the 'Like' feature as the current option is insufficient for expressing my emotions towards your post?
-
I agree with bringing back o levels even though I don't think my eldest will do as well. The current course work set up would suit her as she is meticulous at that sort of thing but less strong than in cold exams. I think also that there should be a maximum number of subjects studied too to stop pupils being entered very early for exams so that they can cram more in. The result of this is that students get at least a C+ which looks good on school stats, rather than seriously and thoroughly studying a subject and potentially an A.
Similar Threads
-
By HuwandDonna in forum News, Chat & Dilemmas
Replies: 0
Last Post: 22-05-2012, 01:17 PM
-
By The Pom Queen in forum Out and about in Oz
Replies: 0
Last Post: 13-10-2011, 02:32 AM
-
By proud2beaussie in forum Transport & Shipping
Replies: 5
Last Post: 17-11-2009, 05:02 AM
-
By lucie-emily in forum Younger Ones
Replies: 7
Last Post: 15-09-2008, 06:26 PM
-
By sheena in forum Migration Issues
Replies: 1
Last Post: 29-04-2008, 09:54 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Other AMF Group Forums:
Perth Poms |
Poms in Adelaide |
Life in Queensland |
Life in Victoria |
British Expats Abroad
Copyright © 2005 - 2013 PomsInOz.com
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38 PM.
Bookmarks